ORtg
104.7
85th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Marta Arsentjeva
LAT · b. 2009
//measurables
184 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection0.9 BPG · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact104.7 ORtg · 85th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
60.2% TSScoring efficiency · 97th event percentile
3.9 RPGRebounding · 67th event percentile
- 77.5
- HESI v2.1
- #45
- of 192
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #45 of 192 · Established
HESI
77.5
Event performance
77th event percentile
PI
76.5
Prospect index
77th event percentile
ORtg
104.7
Points / 100 poss.
85th event percentile
DRtg
86.5
Lower is better
38th event percentile
NRtg
+18.1
Two-way margin
78th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 104.7 · 85th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 86.5 · Stop% 54.8% · Team DRtg 84.9
Sample context
7 games · 115 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
60.2% TS97th event percentile
Rebounding
3.9 RPG67th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
77.5
77th event percentile
Prospect index
76.5
77th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.7
85th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.5
38th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.1
78th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.8%
45th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.3 PPG
57th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
24th event percentile
Rebounding
3.9 RPG
67th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
48th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.2% TS
97th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P86
Rim Protection
0.9 BPG · 86th event percentile
- P85
Offensive Impact
104.7 ORtg · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 77th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.7 ORtg and 86.5 DRtg, producing a +18.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.2% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 85th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 78th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 38th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.3 PPG
57th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
60.2%
97th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.0%
76th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
50.0%
context1.4 attempts per game
Free throws
92.3%
91st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.6%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
24th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
86.5
38th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.6
57th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.8%
45th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
48th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
25.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.1
78th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+12.0
77th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
77.5
77th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
76.5
77th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.6%
73rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.9 RPG
67th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
115.3
context16.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#45
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
560.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
5.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.6
APG
#45
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#45/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.6
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.3
P57
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
3.9
P67
True shooting
60%
P97
Two-way impact
+18.1
P78
Stops
55%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
40%
10 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
92%
12 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
5.3 / game
10–25
FGM–FGA
5–10
3PM–3PA
12–13
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
27
REB
3.9 / game
8
OREB
19
DREB
3.9
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.1 / game
6
BLK
0.9 / game
10
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
77.5
HESI
76.5
PI
104.7
ORtg
86.5
DRtg
+18.1
NRtg
+12.0
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
44%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
-1.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#43
#44
#46
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
5.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.6
APG
0.1
SPG
0.9
BPG
50%
3P%
60%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #45
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.6
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.3
P57
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
3.9
P67
True shooting
60%
P97
Two-way impact
+18.1
P78
Stops
55%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
40%
10 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
92%
12 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
5.3 / game
10–25
FGM–FGA
5–10
3PM–3PA
12–13
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
27
REB
3.9 / game
8
OREB
19
DREB
3.9
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.1 / game
6
BLK
0.9 / game
10
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
77.5
HESI
76.5
PI
104.7
ORtg
86.5
DRtg
+18.1
NRtg
+12.0
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
44%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
-1.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.