ORtg
82.7
40th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Shooting Guard · IND · b. 2008
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
4.5 APGCreation · 93rd event percentile
7.5 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #125 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
33.7
Event performance
34th event percentile
PI
38.5
Prospect index
34th event percentile
ORtg
82.7
Points / 100 poss.
40th event percentile
DRtg
102.8
Lower is better
45th event percentile
NRtg
-20.0
Two-way margin
40th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 82.7 · 40th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 102.8 · Stop% 56.6% · Team DRtg 103.0
Sample context
4 games · 140 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Rebounding
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
33.7
34th event percentile
Prospect index
38.5
34th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
82.7
40th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
102.8
45th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.0
40th event percentile
Stop percentage
56.6%
67th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
14.0 PPG
91st event percentile
Creation
4.5 APG
93rd event percentile
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks
86th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.0% TS
51st event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
4.5 APG · 93rd event percentile
Rebounder
7.5 RPG · 92nd event percentile
Scorer
14.0 PPG · 91st event percentile
Activity
7.5 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/G · 88th event percentile
Disruptor
2.5 steals + blocks per game · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 34th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.7 ORtg and 102.8 DRtg, producing a -20.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and scoring load. The lowest relative area is offensive efficiency.
Creation
4.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
14.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
82.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
82.7
40th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
14.0 PPG
91st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
47.0%
51st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
43.4%
49th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
39.6%
52nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
15.4%
context6.5 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
48th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.7%
45th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.5 APG
93rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
102.8
45th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
103.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.2
63rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
56.6%
67th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.5 STL+BLK
86th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-20.0
40th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-16.4
34th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
33.7
34th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
38.5
34th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.1%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.5 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
139.8
context35.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#125
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
315.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
14.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
4.5
APG
#125
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
14.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
4.5
APG
5.5
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.0
P91
Playmaking
4.5
P93
Rebounding
7.5
P92
True shooting
47%
P51
Two-way impact
-20.0
P40
Stops
57%
P67
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
21 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
15%
4 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
10 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
56
PTS
14.0 / game
21–53
FGM–FGA
4–26
3PM–3PA
10–15
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
4.5 / game
22
TOV
5.5 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
30
REB
7.5 / game
9
OREB
21
DREB
7.5
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
3
BLK
0.8 / game
6
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
33.7
HESI
38.5
PI
82.7
ORtg
102.8
DRtg
-20.0
NRtg
-16.4
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
8%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
+0.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#125
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
14.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
4.5
APG
1.8
SPG
0.8
BPG
15%
3P%
47%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #125
//quick_read
14.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
4.5
APG
5.5
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.0
P91
Playmaking
4.5
P93
Rebounding
7.5
P92
True shooting
47%
P51
Two-way impact
-20.0
P40
Stops
57%
P67
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
21 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
15%
4 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
10 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
56
PTS
14.0 / game
21–53
FGM–FGA
4–26
3PM–3PA
10–15
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
4.5 / game
22
TOV
5.5 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
30
REB
7.5 / game
9
OREB
21
DREB
7.5
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
3
BLK
0.8 / game
6
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
33.7
HESI
38.5
PI
82.7
ORtg
102.8
DRtg
-20.0
NRtg
-16.4
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
8%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
+0.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.