ORtg
81.0
38th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Shekhar Rathee
Forward · IND · b. 2009
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator7.5 APG · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity6.3 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
7.5 APGCreation · 99th event percentile
6.3 RPGRebounding · 85th event percentile
- 33.2
- HESI v2.1
- #126
- of 188
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #126 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
33.2
Event performance
33rd event percentile
PI
38.0
Prospect index
33rd event percentile
ORtg
81.0
Points / 100 poss.
38th event percentile
DRtg
101.4
Lower is better
53rd event percentile
NRtg
-20.3
Two-way margin
40th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 81.0 · 38th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 101.4 · Stop% 59.7% · Team DRtg 103.0
Sample context
4 games · 150 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
7.5 APG99th event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG85th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
33.2
33rd event percentile
Prospect index
38.0
33rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
81.0
38th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
101.4
53rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.3
40th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.7%
75th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.3 PPG
78th event percentile
Creation
7.5 APG
99th event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
85th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.8 stocks
78th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.2% TS
28th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Creator
7.5 APG · 99th event percentile
- P80
Activity
6.3 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 33rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 81.0 ORtg and 101.4 DRtg, producing a -20.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Creation
7.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 85th event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 78th event percentile
Scoring load
10.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 28th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 38th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
81.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 40th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.3 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.3 PPG
78th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.2%
28th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.3%
31st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
34th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
7.1%
context3.5 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.6%
41st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
7.5 APG
99th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
101.4
53rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
103.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.6
73rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.7%
75th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.8 STL+BLK
78th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
35.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-20.3
40th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-16.8
33rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
33.2
33rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
38.0
33rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.1%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.3 RPG
85th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
150.2
context37.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#126
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
315.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
10.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
7.5
APG
#126
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#126/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
7.5
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.3
P78
Playmaking
7.5
P99
Rebounding
6.3
P85
True shooting
38%
P28
Two-way impact
-20.3
P40
Stops
60%
P75
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
17 made / 51 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
6 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
27% of attempts from three
●2PA 37●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
41
PTS
10.3 / game
17–51
FGM–FGA
1–14
3PM–3PA
6–6
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
7.5 / game
17
TOV
4.3 / game
1.76×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
25
REB
6.3 / game
2
OREB
23
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
11
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33.2
HESI
38.0
PI
81.0
ORtg
101.4
DRtg
-20.3
NRtg
-16.8
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
9%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
+1.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #125Piyush ChoudharySG · INDrank_below · #127Yusuf TakritiG · SYR
//current_rank
#126
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#124
#125
Shooting Guard · IND
14.0 PPG 7.5 RPG 4.5 APG
//event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#127
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
10.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
7.5
APG
2.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
7%
3P%
38%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #126
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
7.5
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.3
P78
Playmaking
7.5
P99
Rebounding
6.3
P85
True shooting
38%
P28
Two-way impact
-20.3
P40
Stops
60%
P75
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
17 made / 51 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
6 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
27% of attempts from three
●2PA 37●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
41
PTS
10.3 / game
17–51
FGM–FGA
1–14
3PM–3PA
6–6
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
7.5 / game
17
TOV
4.3 / game
1.76×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
25
REB
6.3 / game
2
OREB
23
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
11
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33.2
HESI
38.0
PI
81.0
ORtg
101.4
DRtg
-20.3
NRtg
-16.8
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
9%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
+1.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.