ORtg
74.9
32nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Yusuf Takriti
Combo Guard · SYR · b. 2008
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
5.0 RPGRebounding · 77th event percentile
9.3 PPGScoring load · 74th event percentile
- 32.6
- HESI v2.1
- #127
- of 188
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #127 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
32.6
Event performance
33rd event percentile
PI
37.6
Prospect index
33rd event percentile
ORtg
74.9
Points / 100 poss.
32nd event percentile
DRtg
97.3
Lower is better
65th event percentile
NRtg
-22.4
Two-way margin
38th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 74.9 · 32nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 97.3 · Stop% 48.8% · Team DRtg 94.2
Sample context
4 games · 113 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
5.0 RPG77th event percentile
Scoring load
9.3 PPG74th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
32.6
33rd event percentile
Prospect index
37.6
33rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
74.9
32nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
97.3
65th event percentile
Two-way margin
-22.4
38th event percentile
Stop percentage
48.8%
46th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.3 PPG
74th event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
61st event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
40th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.0% TS
25th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 33rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.9 ORtg and 97.3 DRtg, producing a -22.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 77th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 74th event percentile
Scoring load
9.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 25th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 32nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
74.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 38th event percentile
Two-way margin
-22.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.3 PPG
74th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.0%
25th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
28.7%
22nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
23.4%
20th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
29.4%
context4.3 attempts per game
Free throws
58.8%
42nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
33.9%
31st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
61st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
97.3
65th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
94.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.2
43rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
48.8%
46th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
40th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
21.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-22.4
38th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.4
33rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
32.6
33rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
37.6
33rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.3%
31st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
113.3
context28.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#127
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
313.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
9.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.5
APG
#127
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#127/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.3
P74
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
34%
P25
Two-way impact
-22.4
P38
Stops
49%
P46
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
23%
11 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
●2PA 30●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
9.3 / game
11–47
FGM–FGA
5–17
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.5 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
20
REB
5.0 / game
5
OREB
15
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
32.6
HESI
37.6
PI
74.9
ORtg
97.3
DRtg
-22.4
NRtg
-17.4
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
1%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #126Shekhar RatheeF · INDrank_below · #128yousif Yaqoob meshaeiPG · BRN
//current_rank
#127
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#125
Shooting Guard · IND
14.0 PPG 7.5 RPG 4.5 APG
//event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#126
Forward · IND
10.3 PPG 6.3 RPG 7.5 APG
//event_signalCreator7.5 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#128
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
9.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.5
APG
0.8
SPG
0.0
BPG
29%
3P%
34%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #127
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.3
P74
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
34%
P25
Two-way impact
-22.4
P38
Stops
49%
P46
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
23%
11 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
●2PA 30●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
9.3 / game
11–47
FGM–FGA
5–17
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.5 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
20
REB
5.0 / game
5
OREB
15
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
32.6
HESI
37.6
PI
74.9
ORtg
97.3
DRtg
-22.4
NRtg
-17.4
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
1%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.