Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Nya Riak

USA · b. 2010

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

4.0 RPGRebounding · 69th event percentile

44.9% TSScoring efficiency · 62nd event percentile

84.3
HESI v2.1: #29
of 192: 55%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #29 of 192 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

84.3

Event performance

84th event percentile

83.1

Prospect index

85th event percentile

ORtg

94.5

Points / 100 poss.

70th event percentile

DRtg

66.0

Lower is better

92nd event percentile

NRtg

+28.5

Two-way margin

87th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 94.5 · 70th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 66.0 · Stop% 69.8% · Team DRtg 66.5

Sample context

6 games · 73 minutes · 55% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

4.0 RPG69th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.9% TS62nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

84.3

84th event percentile

Prospect index

83.1

85th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

94.5

70th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

66.0

92nd event percentile

Two-way margin

+28.5

87th event percentile

Stop percentage

69.8%

83rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.2 PPG

48th event percentile

Creation

1.2 APG

50th event percentile

Rebounding

4.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks

48th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.9% TS

62nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P87
Defensive Impact
66.0 DRtg · 70% Stop% · 87th event percentile
P85
Event Impact
84.3 HESI performance · 85th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 84th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 94.5 ORtg and 66.0 DRtg, producing a +28.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
66.0 DRtg
92nd event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+28.5 NRtg
87th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Defensive stops
69.8% Stop%
83rd event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

94.5

70th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.2 PPG

48th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

44.9%

62nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

50.0%

88th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

43.5%

84th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

21.4%

context

2.3 attempts per game

Free throws

18.2%

8th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

43.9%

73rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.2 APG

50th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

66.0

92nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

66.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.5

70th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

69.8%

83rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.8 STL+BLK

48th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

20.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+28.5

87th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+15.7

84th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

84.3

84th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

83.1

85th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.1%

60th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

73.2

context

12.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

54.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#29

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

564.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

4.2

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.2

APG

#29

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#29/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.2

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.2

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

45%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.2

P48

Playmaking

1.2

P50

Rebounding

4.0

P69

True shooting

45%

P62

Two-way impact

+28.5

P87

Stops

70%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

44%

10 made / 23 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

21%

3 made / 14 attempts

Free throws

18%

2 made / 11 attempts

Shot selection

61% of attempts from three

●2PA 9●3PA 14

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.2 / game

10–23

FGM–FGA

3–14

3PM–3PA

2–11

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.2 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

1.17×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.0 / game

OREB

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.5 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

84.3

HESI

83.1

94.5

ORtg

66.0

DRtg

+28.5

NRtg

+15.7

Stable NRtg

70%

Stop%

44%

Floor%

50%

eFG%

PIE

66.5

Team DRtg

+0.5

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #28Aya IshiwataJPN

//current_rank

#29

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #30Jordyn NohrCanada

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.2

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.2

APG

0.5

SPG

0.3

BPG

21%

3P%

45%

TS%

event_stats