ORtg
56.5
51st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Benedicta Trinitée Djiahou H. Attekpami
Center · BEN · b. 2009
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder10.5 RPG · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
10.5 RPGRebounding · 96th event percentile
1.8 stocksDefensive activity · 62nd event percentile
- 32.6
- HESI v2.1
- #97
- of 142
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #97 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
32.6
Event performance
33rd event percentile
PI
38.8
Prospect index
32nd event percentile
ORtg
56.5
Points / 100 poss.
51st event percentile
DRtg
77.5
Lower is better
17th event percentile
NRtg
-21.0
Two-way margin
38th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 56.5 · 51st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 77.5 · Stop% 67.6% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 112 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
10.5 RPG96th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks62nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
32.6
33rd event percentile
Prospect index
38.8
32nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
56.5
51st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
77.5
17th event percentile
Two-way margin
-21.0
38th event percentile
Stop percentage
67.6%
60th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.5 PPG
60th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
23rd event percentile
Rebounding
10.5 RPG
96th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.8% TS
50th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P96
Rebounder
10.5 RPG · 96th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 33rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 56.5 ORtg and 77.5 DRtg, producing a -21.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 96th event percentile
Rebounding
10.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 17th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
77.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 23rd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 38th event percentile
Two-way margin
-21.0 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.5 PPG
60th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
32.8%
50th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
28.3%
46th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.1%
46th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
50.0%
context0.5 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
28.4%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
23rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
77.5
17th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.6
81st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
67.6%
60th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
38.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-21.0
38th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-16.7
33rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
32.6
33rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
38.8
32nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.7%
79th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
10.5 RPG
96th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
111.8
context27.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#97
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
4.5
PPG
10.5
RPG
0.3
APG
#97
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#3
RANK
20
FIELD
89%
PERCENTILE
6.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#97/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.5
PPG
10.5
RPG
0.3
APG
2.8
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.5
P60
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
10.5
P96
True shooting
33%
P50
Two-way impact
-21.0
P38
Stops
68%
P60
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
6 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
9% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
18
PTS
4.5 / game
6–23
FGM–FGA
1–2
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
11
TOV
2.8 / game
0.09×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
42
REB
10.5 / game
14
OREB
28
DREB
10.5
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
32.6
HESI
38.8
PI
56.5
ORtg
77.5
DRtg
-21.0
NRtg
-16.7
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
10%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
+2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#3/20view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
18.0
RPG
0.5
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
21%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P70
Playmaking
0.5
P50
Rebounding
18.0
P98
True shooting
21%
P28
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
15% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
6.5 / game
5–27
FGM–FGA
0–4
3PM–3PA
3–8
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
3.5 / game
0.14×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
36
REB
18.0 / game
15
OREB
21
DREB
18.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.5 / game
8
PF
5
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
19%
eFG%
19%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #96OMONYELE MIRABELLE ESPOIRE KPADJOUDAG · Beninrank_below · #98Naelle annie lackbira KailechMorocco
//current_rank
#97
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#95
#96
#98
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
6.5
PPG
18.0
RPG
0.5
APG
2.0
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
21%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #97
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.5
PPG
10.5
RPG
0.3
APG
2.8
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.5
P60
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
10.5
P96
True shooting
33%
P50
Two-way impact
-21.0
P38
Stops
68%
P60
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
6 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
9% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
18
PTS
4.5 / game
6–23
FGM–FGA
1–2
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
11
TOV
2.8 / game
0.09×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
42
REB
10.5 / game
14
OREB
28
DREB
10.5
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
32.6
HESI
38.8
PI
56.5
ORtg
77.5
DRtg
-21.0
NRtg
-16.7
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
10%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
+2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 32026
2 GP · event rank #3
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
18.0
RPG
0.5
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
21%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P70
Playmaking
0.5
P50
Rebounding
18.0
P98
True shooting
21%
P28
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
15% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
6.5 / game
5–27
FGM–FGA
0–4
3PM–3PA
3–8
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
3.5 / game
0.14×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
36
REB
18.0 / game
15
OREB
21
DREB
18.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.5 / game
8
PF
5
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
19%
eFG%
19%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.