back_to_rankings
Cole Hopoi portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Cole Hopoi

Forward · NZL · b. 2008

//measurables

201 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Impact90.9 HESI performance · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer11.3 PPG · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

11.3 PPGScoring load · 86th event percentile

2.3 APGCreation · 81st event percentile

90.9
HESI v2.1
#18
of 188
73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #18 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

90.9

Event performance

91st event percentile

PI

84.2

Prospect index

91st event percentile

ORtg

118.8

Points / 100 poss.

81st event percentile

DRtg

88.0

Lower is better

85th event percentile

NRtg

+30.7

Two-way margin

85th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 118.8 · 81st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.0 · Stop% 53.1% · Team DRtg 84.8

Sample context

6 games · 166 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

11.3 PPG86th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG81st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

90.9

91st event percentile

Prospect index

84.2

91st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

118.8

81st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.0

85th event percentile

Two-way margin

+30.7

85th event percentile

Stop percentage

53.1%

58th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

11.3 PPG

86th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

81st event percentile

Rebounding

4.3 RPG

69th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

48th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

50.8% TS

63rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P88

    Event Impact

    90.9 HESI performance · 88th event percentile

  • P86

    Scorer

    11.3 PPG · 86th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 91st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 118.8 ORtg and 88.0 DRtg, producing a +30.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring load

    11.3 PPG

    86th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    88.0 DRtg

    85th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Two-way margin

    +30.7 NRtg

    85th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

118.8

81st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

11.3 PPG

86th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

50.8%

63rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

46.6%

60th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

42.4%

60th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

29.4%

context

2.8 attempts per game

Free throws

72.2%

59th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

55.3%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

81st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.0

85th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.2

42nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

53.1%

58th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

48th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

34.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+30.7

85th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+20.5

91st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

90.9

91st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

84.2

91st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

7.7%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.3 RPG

69th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

166.3

context

27.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#18

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

466.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

11.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

#18

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#18/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.3

P86

Playmaking

2.3

P81

Rebounding

4.3

P69

True shooting

51%

P63

Two-way impact

+30.7

P85

Stops

53%

P58

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

42%

25 made / 59 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

5 made / 17 attempts

FT

Free throws

72%

13 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

2PA 423PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

68

PTS

11.3 / game

25–59

FGM–FGA

5–17

3PM–3PA

13–18

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

5

TOV

0.8 / game

2.80×

AST:TOV

19

FD

rebounding

26

REB

4.3 / game

8

OREB

18

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

13

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

90.9

HESI

84.2

PI

118.8

ORtg

88.0

DRtg

+30.7

NRtg

+20.5

Stable NRtg

53%

Stop%

55%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

8%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games166 minutes27.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #18 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Jihoon Yoon portrait#16

    Jihoon Yoon

    Guard · KOR

    18.8 PPG 3.5 RPG 6.8 APG

    //event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 4.5 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer18.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Zakaria Ekko portrait#17

    Zakaria Ekko

    Small Forward · SYR

    3.0 PPG 0.5 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Hassan Oshobuge Abdulkadir portrait#19

    Hassan Oshobuge Abdulkadir

    Center · BRN, NGR

    21.3 PPG 13.0 RPG 1.5 APG

    //event_signalScorer21.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder13.0 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

11.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

1.2

SPG

0.0

BPG

29%

3P%

51%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #18

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.3

P86

Playmaking

2.3

P81

Rebounding

4.3

P69

True shooting

51%

P63

Two-way impact

+30.7

P85

Stops

53%

P58

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

42%

25 made / 59 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

5 made / 17 attempts

FT

Free throws

72%

13 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

2PA 423PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

68

PTS

11.3 / game

25–59

FGM–FGA

5–17

3PM–3PA

13–18

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

5

TOV

0.8 / game

2.80×

AST:TOV

19

FD

rebounding

26

REB

4.3 / game

8

OREB

18

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

13

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

90.9

HESI

84.2

PI

118.8

ORtg

88.0

DRtg

+30.7

NRtg

+20.5

Stable NRtg

53%

Stop%

55%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

8%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games166 minutes27.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #18 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.