ORtg
118.8
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · NZL · b. 2008
//measurables
201 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
11.3 PPGScoring load · 86th event percentile
2.3 APGCreation · 81st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #18 of 188 · Established
HESI
90.9
Event performance
91st event percentile
PI
84.2
Prospect index
91st event percentile
ORtg
118.8
Points / 100 poss.
81st event percentile
DRtg
88.0
Lower is better
85th event percentile
NRtg
+30.7
Two-way margin
85th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 118.8 · 81st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.0 · Stop% 53.1% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 166 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Creation
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
90.9
91st event percentile
Prospect index
84.2
91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
118.8
81st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.0
85th event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.7
85th event percentile
Stop percentage
53.1%
58th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
11.3 PPG
86th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
81st event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
69th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
48th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS
63rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Impact
90.9 HESI performance · 88th event percentile
Scorer
11.3 PPG · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 91st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 118.8 ORtg and 88.0 DRtg, producing a +30.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Scoring load
11.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive efficiency
88.0 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+30.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
118.8
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
11.3 PPG
86th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.8%
63rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
46.6%
60th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.4%
60th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
29.4%
context2.8 attempts per game
Free throws
72.2%
59th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
55.3%
84th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
81st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.0
85th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.2
42nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.1%
58th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
48th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+30.7
85th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+20.5
91st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
90.9
91st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
84.2
91st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.7%
80th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
69th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
166.3
context27.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#18
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
11.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
#18
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
11.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.3
P86
Playmaking
2.3
P81
Rebounding
4.3
P69
True shooting
51%
P63
Two-way impact
+30.7
P85
Stops
53%
P58
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
25 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
68
PTS
11.3 / game
25–59
FGM–FGA
5–17
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
2.80×
AST:TOV
19
FD
rebounding
26
REB
4.3 / game
8
OREB
18
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
13
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
90.9
HESI
84.2
PI
118.8
ORtg
88.0
DRtg
+30.7
NRtg
+20.5
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
8%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#18
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
11.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
1.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
29%
3P%
51%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #18
//quick_read
11.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.3
P86
Playmaking
2.3
P81
Rebounding
4.3
P69
True shooting
51%
P63
Two-way impact
+30.7
P85
Stops
53%
P58
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
25 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
68
PTS
11.3 / game
25–59
FGM–FGA
5–17
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
2.80×
AST:TOV
19
FD
rebounding
26
REB
4.3 / game
8
OREB
18
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
13
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
90.9
HESI
84.2
PI
118.8
ORtg
88.0
DRtg
+30.7
NRtg
+20.5
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
8%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.