Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Hassan Oshobuge Abdulkadir

Center · BRN, NGR · b. 2009

//measurables

204 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

21.3 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile

13.0 RPGRebounding · 99th event percentile

90.4
HESI v2.1: #19
of 188: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #19 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

90.4

Event performance

90th event percentile

83.8

Prospect index

90th event percentile

ORtg

125.6

Points / 100 poss.

88th event percentile

DRtg

93.1

Lower is better

74th event percentile

NRtg

+32.5

Two-way margin

86th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 125.6 · 88th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 93.1 · Stop% 68.3% · Team DRtg 98.4

Sample context

4 games · 131 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

21.3 PPG99th event percentile

Rebounding

13.0 RPG99th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

90.4

90th event percentile

Prospect index

83.8

90th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

125.6

88th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

93.1

74th event percentile

Two-way margin

+32.5

86th event percentile

Stop percentage

68.3%

90th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

21.3 PPG

99th event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG

61st event percentile

Rebounding

13.0 RPG

99th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.3 stocks

93rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

61.2% TS

86th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P99
Scorer
21.3 PPG · 99th event percentile
P99
Rebounder
13.0 RPG · 99th event percentile
P95
Activity
13.0 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 95th event percentile
P93
Disruptor
3.3 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentile
P92
Rim Protection
1.3 BPG · 92nd event percentile
P88
Event Impact
90.4 HESI performance · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 90th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 125.6 ORtg and 93.1 DRtg, producing a +32.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, rebounding, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Scoring load
21.3 PPG
99th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
13.0 RPG
99th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
3.3 steals + blocks/G
93rd event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

125.6

88th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

21.3 PPG

99th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

61.2%

86th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

57.4%

83rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

57.4%

91st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Free throws

65.7%

46th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

63.6%

95th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.5 APG

61st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

93.1

74th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

98.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+5.3

89th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

68.3%

90th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.3 STL+BLK

93rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+32.5

86th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+19.8

90th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

90.4

90th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

83.8

90th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

17.2%

93rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

13.0 RPG

99th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

130.7

context

32.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

68.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#19

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

336.4

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

21.3

PPG

13.0

RPG

1.5

APG

#19

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#19/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

21.3

PPG

13.0

RPG

1.5

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

61%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

21.3

P99

Playmaking

1.5

P61

Rebounding

13.0

P99

True shooting

61%

P86

Two-way impact

+32.5

P86

Stops

68%

P90

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

57%

31 made / 54 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 4 attempts

Free throws

66%

23 made / 35 attempts

Shot selection

7% of attempts from three

●2PA 50●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

21.3 / game

31–54

FGM–FGA

0–4

3PM–3PA

23–35

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.5 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

0.86×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

13.0 / game

OREB

DREB

13.0

REB/G

defense

STL

2.0 / game

BLK

1.3 / game

STL+BLK

3.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

90.4

HESI

83.8

125.6

ORtg

93.1

DRtg

+32.5

NRtg

+19.8

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

64%

Floor%

57%

eFG%

17%

PIE

98.4

Team DRtg

+5.3

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #18Cole HopoiF · NZL

//current_rank

#19

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #20Isaac RiddleC · AUS

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

21.3

PPG

13.0

RPG

1.5

APG

2.0

SPG

1.3

BPG

3P%

61%

TS%

event_stats