ORtg
119.6
82nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Isaac Riddle
Center · AUS · b. 2008
//measurables
203 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Impact89.8 HESI performance · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+38.1 Net Rating · 83rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
5.2 RPGRebounding · 80th event percentile
56.5% TSScoring efficiency · 76th event percentile
- 89.8
- HESI v2.1
- #20
- of 188
- 59%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #20 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
89.8
Event performance
90th event percentile
PI
83.4
Prospect index
90th event percentile
ORtg
119.6
Points / 100 poss.
82nd event percentile
DRtg
81.4
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+38.1
Two-way margin
90th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 119.6 · 82nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.4 · Stop% 53.7% · Team DRtg 74.7
Sample context
6 games · 88 minutes · 59% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
5.2 RPG80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.5% TS76th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
89.8
90th event percentile
Prospect index
83.4
90th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
119.6
82nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.4
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+38.1
90th event percentile
Stop percentage
53.7%
60th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.8 PPG
63rd event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
5.2 RPG
80th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks
27th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.5% TS
76th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P90
Event Impact
89.8 HESI performance · 90th event percentile
- P83
Two-Way Impact
+38.1 Net Rating · 83rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 90th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 119.6 ORtg and 81.4 DRtg, producing a +38.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive activity and creation.
Relative strengths
- 93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 90th event percentile
Two-way margin
+38.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 82nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
119.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 27th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 29th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.8 PPG
63rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
56.5%
76th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
55.7%
79th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
54.3%
87th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context0.8 attempts per game
Free throws
53.3%
38th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
59.6%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.4
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
74.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.7
18th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.7%
60th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.3 STL+BLK
27th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
20.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+38.1
90th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+19.5
90th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
89.8
90th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
83.4
90th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.2%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.2 RPG
80th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
88.1
context14.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
59.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#20
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
509.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
7.8
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.5
APG
#20
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#20/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.8
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.5
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.8
P63
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
5.2
P80
True shooting
56%
P76
Two-way impact
+38.1
P90
Stops
54%
P60
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
54%
19 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
8 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
14% of attempts from three
●2PA 30●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
47
PTS
7.8 / game
19–35
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
8–15
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.5 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
31
REB
5.2 / game
16
OREB
15
DREB
5.2
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
89.8
HESI
83.4
PI
119.6
ORtg
81.4
DRtg
+38.1
NRtg
+19.5
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
56%
eFG%
4%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
-6.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #19Hassan Oshobuge AbdulkadirC · BRN, NGRrank_below · #21William HamiltonF · AUS
//current_rank
#20
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#18
#19
Center · BRN, NGR
21.3 PPG 13.0 RPG 1.5 APG
//event_signalScorer21.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder13.0 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#21
Forward · AUS
9.2 PPG 7.2 RPG 1.5 APG
//event_signalShooter36% 3PT on 4.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
7.8
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.5
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
20%
3P%
56%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.8
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.5
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.8
P63
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
5.2
P80
True shooting
56%
P76
Two-way impact
+38.1
P90
Stops
54%
P60
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
54%
19 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
8 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
14% of attempts from three
●2PA 30●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
47
PTS
7.8 / game
19–35
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
8–15
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.5 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
31
REB
5.2 / game
16
OREB
15
DREB
5.2
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
89.8
HESI
83.4
PI
119.6
ORtg
81.4
DRtg
+38.1
NRtg
+19.5
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
56%
eFG%
4%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
-6.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.