ORtg
113.2
77th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · AUS · b. 2009
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
7.2 RPGRebounding · 90th event percentile
57.1% TSScoring efficiency · 78th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #21 of 188 · Established
HESI
89.3
Event performance
89th event percentile
PI
82.9
Prospect index
89th event percentile
ORtg
113.2
Points / 100 poss.
77th event percentile
DRtg
81.6
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+31.7
Two-way margin
85th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 113.2 · 77th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.6 · Stop% 53.4% · Team DRtg 74.7
Sample context
6 games · 122 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
89.3
89th event percentile
Prospect index
82.9
89th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
113.2
77th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.6
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+31.7
85th event percentile
Stop percentage
53.4%
59th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
9.2 PPG
73rd event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
61st event percentile
Rebounding
7.2 RPG
90th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.2 stocks
31st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
57.1% TS
78th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
7.2 RPG · 90th event percentile
Event Impact
89.3 HESI performance · 87th event percentile
Shooter
36% 3PT on 4.2 3PA/G
Two-Way Impact
+31.7 Net Rating · 79th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 89th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 113.2 ORtg and 81.6 DRtg, producing a +31.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.
Defensive efficiency
81.6 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Rebounding
7.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Two-way margin
+31.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Defensive activity
0.2 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
113.2
77th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
9.2 PPG
73rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
57.1%
78th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
55.4%
78th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
45.7%
74th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
36.0%
context4.2 attempts per game
Free throws
80.0%
75th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
48.2%
69th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
61st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.6
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
74.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.8
16th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.4%
59th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.2 STL+BLK
31st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+31.7
85th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+18.6
89th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
89.3
89th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
82.9
89th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.2%
80th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.2 RPG
90th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
121.9
context20.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#21
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
509.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
1.5
APG
#21
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
1.5
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.2
P73
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
7.2
P90
True shooting
57%
P78
Two-way impact
+31.7
P85
Stops
53%
P59
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
21 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
9 made / 25 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
4 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
54% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
55
PTS
9.2 / game
21–46
FGM–FGA
9–25
3PM–3PA
4–5
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
12
TOV
2.0 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
43
REB
7.2 / game
14
OREB
29
DREB
7.2
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
89.3
HESI
82.9
PI
113.2
ORtg
81.6
DRtg
+31.7
NRtg
+18.6
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
55%
eFG%
6%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
-6.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
1.5
APG
0.0
SPG
0.2
BPG
36%
3P%
57%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #21
//quick_read
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
1.5
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.2
P73
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
7.2
P90
True shooting
57%
P78
Two-way impact
+31.7
P85
Stops
53%
P59
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
21 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
9 made / 25 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
4 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
54% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
55
PTS
9.2 / game
21–46
FGM–FGA
9–25
3PM–3PA
4–5
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
12
TOV
2.0 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
43
REB
7.2 / game
14
OREB
29
DREB
7.2
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
89.3
HESI
82.9
PI
113.2
ORtg
81.6
DRtg
+31.7
NRtg
+18.6
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
55%
eFG%
6%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
-6.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.