ORtg
52.0
15th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · SRI · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
8.7 RPGRebounding · 96th event percentile
3.3 stocksDefensive activity · 88th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #187 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
0.5
Event performance
1st event percentile
PI
11.9
Prospect index
1st event percentile
ORtg
52.0
Points / 100 poss.
15th event percentile
DRtg
120.5
Lower is better
9th event percentile
NRtg
-68.5
Two-way margin
13th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 52.0 · 15th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 120.5 · Stop% 47.4% · Team DRtg 122.0
Sample context
3 games · 109 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
0.5
1st event percentile
Prospect index
11.9
1st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
52.0
15th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
120.5
9th event percentile
Two-way margin
-68.5
13th event percentile
Stop percentage
47.4%
41st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
5.3 PPG
45th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
67th event percentile
Rebounding
8.7 RPG
96th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
88th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
22.2% TS
13th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
8.7 RPG · 96th event percentile
Rim Protection
2.0 BPG · 96th event percentile
Activity
8.7 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 90th event percentile
Disruptor
3.3 steals + blocks per game · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 1st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.0 ORtg and 120.5 DRtg, producing a -68.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive activity, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.
Rebounding
8.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
3.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Creation
1.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive efficiency
120.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-68.5 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
22.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
52.0
15th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
5.3 PPG
45th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
22.2%
13th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
18.8%
12th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
18.8%
14th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
44.4%
20th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
26.9%
19th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
67th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
120.5
9th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
122.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.5
72nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
47.4%
41st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
88th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
21.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-68.5
13th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-47.0
1st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
0.5
1st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
11.9
1st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.0%
31st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.7 RPG
96th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
108.5
context36.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#187
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
248.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
5.3
PPG
8.7
RPG
1.7
APG
#187
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
5.3
PPG
8.7
RPG
1.7
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
22%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.3
P45
Playmaking
1.7
P67
Rebounding
8.7
P96
True shooting
22%
P13
Two-way impact
-68.5
P13
Stops
47%
P41
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
19%
6 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
16
PTS
5.3 / game
6–32
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.7 / game
6
TOV
2.0 / game
0.83×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
26
REB
8.7 / game
11
OREB
15
DREB
8.7
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.3 / game
6
BLK
2.0 / game
8
PF
10
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
0.5
HESI
11.9
PI
52.0
ORtg
120.5
DRtg
-68.5
NRtg
-47.0
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
1%
PIE
122.0
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#187
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
5.3
PPG
8.7
RPG
1.7
APG
1.3
SPG
2.0
BPG
—
3P%
22%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #187
//quick_read
5.3
PPG
8.7
RPG
1.7
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
22%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.3
P45
Playmaking
1.7
P67
Rebounding
8.7
P96
True shooting
22%
P13
Two-way impact
-68.5
P13
Stops
47%
P41
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
19%
6 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
16
PTS
5.3 / game
6–32
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.7 / game
6
TOV
2.0 / game
0.83×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
26
REB
8.7 / game
11
OREB
15
DREB
8.7
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.3 / game
6
BLK
2.0 / game
8
PF
10
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
0.5
HESI
11.9
PI
52.0
ORtg
120.5
DRtg
-68.5
NRtg
-47.0
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
1%
PIE
122.0
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.