ORtg
68.5
31st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Susanna Perego
ITA · b. 2009
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
4.0 PPGScoring load · 45th event percentile
37.8% TSScoring efficiency · 38th event percentile
- 33.5
- HESI v2.1
- #130
- of 192
- 36%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #130 of 192 · Limited sample
HESI
33.5
Event performance
34th event percentile
PI
41.3
Prospect index
33rd event percentile
ORtg
68.5
Points / 100 poss.
31st event percentile
DRtg
89.7
Lower is better
24th event percentile
NRtg
-21.2
Two-way margin
27th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 68.5 · 31st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.7 · Stop% 51.0% · Team DRtg 86.3
Sample context
3 games · 34 minutes · 36% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
4.0 PPG45th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.8% TS38th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
33.5
34th event percentile
Prospect index
41.3
33rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
68.5
31st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.7
24th event percentile
Two-way margin
-21.2
27th event percentile
Stop percentage
51.0%
32nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
45th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
13th event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
36th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
11th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.8% TS
38th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 34th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 68.5 ORtg and 89.7 DRtg, producing a -21.2 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive activity, creation, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 11th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 13th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 24th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.7 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
45th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.8%
38th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.0%
59th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
49th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
0.0%
3rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
28.7%
25th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
13th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.7
24th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
86.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.4
37th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
51.0%
32nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
11th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
6.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-21.2
27th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.6
34th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
33.5
34th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
41.3
33rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.1%
11th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.3 RPG
36th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
34.4
context11.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
36.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#130
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
525.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
3
GP
4.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.3
APG
#130
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#130/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P45
Playmaking
0.3
P13
Rebounding
2.3
P36
True shooting
38%
P38
Two-way impact
-21.2
P27
Stops
51%
P32
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
5 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
●2PA 8●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
4.0 / game
5–15
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
3
TOV
1.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
7
REB
2.3 / game
1
OREB
6
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33.5
HESI
41.3
PI
68.5
ORtg
89.7
DRtg
-21.2
NRtg
-7.6
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
0%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
-3.4
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #129Martina ParizkovaCZErank_below · #131Adela RuzickovaCZE
//current_rank
#130
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#128
#129
#131
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
4.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.3
APG
0.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
29%
3P%
38%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #130
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P45
Playmaking
0.3
P13
Rebounding
2.3
P36
True shooting
38%
P38
Two-way impact
-21.2
P27
Stops
51%
P32
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
5 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
●2PA 8●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
4.0 / game
5–15
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
3
TOV
1.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
7
REB
2.3 / game
1
OREB
6
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33.5
HESI
41.3
PI
68.5
ORtg
89.7
DRtg
-21.2
NRtg
-7.6
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
0%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
-3.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.