Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Trinity Ezeanatogu

ESP · b. 2009

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

6.3 RPGRebounding · 89th event percentile

3.1 stocksDefensive activity · 88th event percentile

81.7
HESI v2.1: #36
of 192: 74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #36 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

81.7

Event performance

82nd event percentile

79.8

Prospect index

82nd event percentile

ORtg

79.2

Points / 100 poss.

41st event percentile

DRtg

59.7

Lower is better

98th event percentile

NRtg

+19.5

Two-way margin

80th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 79.2 · 41st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 59.7 · Stop% 78.9% · Team DRtg 63.6

Sample context

7 games · 167 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

6.3 RPG89th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.1 stocks88th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

81.7

82nd event percentile

Prospect index

79.8

82nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

79.2

41st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

59.7

98th event percentile

Two-way margin

+19.5

80th event percentile

Stop percentage

78.9%

92nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.6 PPG

59th event percentile

Creation

2.4 APG

80th event percentile

Rebounding

6.3 RPG

89th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.1 stocks

88th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

29.6% TS

21st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P95
Defensive Impact
59.7 DRtg · 79% Stop% · 95th event percentile
P89
Rebounder
6.3 RPG · 89th event percentile
P88
Activity
6.3 RPG + 3.1 defensive plays/G · 88th event percentile
P88
Disruptor
3.1 steals + blocks per game · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 82nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.2 ORtg and 59.7 DRtg, producing a +19.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
59.7 DRtg
98th event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
78.9% Stop%
92nd event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
89th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
29.6% TS
21st event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

79.2

41st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.6 PPG

59th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

29.6%

21st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

25.0%

18th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

24.1%

24th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

20.0%

context

0.7 attempts per game

Free throws

55.6%

46th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

39.1%

54th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.4 APG

80th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

59.7

98th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

63.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+3.9

87th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

78.9%

92nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.1 STL+BLK

88th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

49.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+19.5

80th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+14.4

82nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

81.7

82nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

79.8

82nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.2%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.3 RPG

89th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

166.5

context

23.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#36

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5.6

PPG

6.3

RPG

2.4

APG

#36

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#36/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.6

PPG

6.3

RPG

2.4

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.6

P59

Playmaking

2.4

P80

Rebounding

6.3

P89

True shooting

30%

P21

Two-way impact

+19.5

P80

Stops

79%

P92

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

24%

14 made / 58 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

Free throws

56%

10 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

9% of attempts from three

●2PA 53●3PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.6 / game

14–58

FGM–FGA

1–5

3PM–3PA

10–18

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.4 / game

TOV

1.7 / game

1.42×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

6.3 / game

OREB

DREB

6.3

REB/G

defense

STL

2.4 / game

BLK

0.7 / game

STL+BLK

3.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

81.7

HESI

79.8

79.2

ORtg

59.7

DRtg

+19.5

NRtg

+14.4

Stable NRtg

79%

Stop%

39%

Floor%

25%

eFG%

PIE

63.6

Team DRtg

+3.9

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #35Leila EissaEgypt

//current_rank

#36

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #37Lily MappAUS

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.6

PPG

6.3

RPG

2.4

APG

2.4

SPG

0.7

BPG

20%

3P%

30%

TS%

event_stats