ORtg
57.9
22nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Aminata Kone
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.5 stocksDefensive activity · 68th event percentile
2.8 RPGRebounding · 50th event percentile
- 13.6
- HESI v2.1
- #166
- of 192
- 57%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #166 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
13.6
Event performance
14th event percentile
PI
25.4
Prospect index
14th event percentile
ORtg
57.9
Points / 100 poss.
22nd event percentile
DRtg
94.6
Lower is better
13th event percentile
NRtg
-36.7
Two-way margin
14th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 57.9 · 22nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 94.6 · Stop% 68.5% · Team DRtg 101.1
Sample context
6 games · 80 minutes · 57% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks68th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG50th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
13.6
14th event percentile
Prospect index
25.4
14th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
57.9
22nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
94.6
13th event percentile
Two-way margin
-36.7
14th event percentile
Stop percentage
68.5%
79th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.3 PPG
38th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
37th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
50th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
68th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.6% TS
18th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 14th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 57.9 ORtg and 94.6 DRtg, producing a -36.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 79th event percentile
Defensive stops
68.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 68th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 13th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
94.6 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 14th event percentile
Two-way margin
-36.7 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 18th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.6% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.3 PPG
38th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
28.6%
18th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
22.6%
15th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
19.4%
14th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
18.2%
context1.8 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
63rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
26.7%
21st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
37th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
94.6
13th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
101.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.5
92nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.5%
79th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
68th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-36.7
14th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-20.9
14th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
13.6
14th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
25.4
14th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.7%
26th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
50th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
80.1
context13.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
57.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#166
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
589.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
6
GP
3.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.8
APG
#166
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#166/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
29%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.3
P38
Playmaking
0.8
P37
Rebounding
2.8
P50
True shooting
29%
P18
Two-way impact
-36.7
P14
Stops
69%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
6 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
2 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
6 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 11
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
3.3 / game
6–31
FGM–FGA
2–11
3PM–3PA
6–9
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.83×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
17
REB
2.8 / game
2
OREB
15
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
11
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
13.6
HESI
25.4
PI
57.9
ORtg
94.6
DRtg
-36.7
NRtg
-20.9
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
23%
eFG%
1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+6.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #165Alessandra PaduloITArank_below · #167Ema NovakovaCZE
//current_rank
#166
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#164
#165
#167
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.2
SPG
0.3
BPG
18%
3P%
29%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #166
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
29%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.3
P38
Playmaking
0.8
P37
Rebounding
2.8
P50
True shooting
29%
P18
Two-way impact
-36.7
P14
Stops
69%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
6 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
2 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
6 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 11
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
3.3 / game
6–31
FGM–FGA
2–11
3PM–3PA
6–9
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.83×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
17
REB
2.8 / game
2
OREB
15
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
11
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
13.6
HESI
25.4
PI
57.9
ORtg
94.6
DRtg
-36.7
NRtg
-20.9
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
23%
eFG%
1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+6.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.