ORtg
86.3
75th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Minty Jean-Philippe Dylan Oka
CIV · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
203 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
- 3
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Senegal U18 · 2026-09-19 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Clipvs vs Senegal U18 · 2026-09-19 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
- Clipvs vs Senegal U18 · 2026-09-19 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-19
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · secondary creator / connector · expanded closeout attacker · screen-and-roll finisher
forward · secondary creator / connector · expanded closeout attacker · screen-and-roll finisher. Best current separators: Post defense. Primary pressure points: Shooting utility, Off-ball value, Short-roll processing.
Now · ForwardProjects · Forward
Translatable strengths
- · Post defense
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Shooting utility
- · Off-ball value
- · Short-roll processing
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. spacing / shooting option usage likely scales down from the current primary load. Can take on more closeout attacker responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Projects as a back-line defender in coverages that keep her near the rim. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
Extended space assignments that consistently pull her away from the paint.
Development priorities
Shooting utility · Off-ball value
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive80.3 performance rating · rank 26 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 86.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive39.4% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive68.4% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #26 of 138 · Established
HESI
80.3
Event performance
80th event percentile
PI
76.9
Prospect index
82nd event percentile
ORtg
86.3
Points / 100 poss.
75th event percentile
DRtg
68.8
Lower is better
76th event percentile
NRtg
+17.5
Two-way margin
80th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 86.3 · 75th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.8 · Stop% 68.4% · Team DRtg 68.8
Sample context
6 games · 110 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
9.3 PPG79th event percentile
Rebounding
5.3 RPG74th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
80.3
80th event percentile
Prospect index
76.9
82nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
86.3
75th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.8
76th event percentile
Two-way margin
+17.5
80th event percentile
Stop percentage
68.4%
72nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.3 PPG
79th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
22nd event percentile
Rebounding
5.3 RPG
74th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
68th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.0% TS
69th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P87
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile
- P76
Two-Way Impact
+17.5 Net Rating · 76th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 80th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 86.3 ORtg and 68.8 DRtg, producing a +17.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, scoring load, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is creation.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Two-way margin
+17.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 79th event percentile
Scoring load
9.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 76th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 22nd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.3 PPG
79th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.0%
69th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
43.2%
74th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.3%
75th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.9%
context4.3 attempts per game
Free throws
35.7%
22nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.4%
71st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
22nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.8
76th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
68.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.0
58th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.4%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
68th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+17.5
80th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+9.4
80th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
80.3
80th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
76.9
82nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.4%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.3 RPG
74th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
109.7
context18.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#26
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
502.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.3
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
#26
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#4
RANK
131
FIELD
98%
PERCENTILE
16.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#26/138Event board →
6
GP
9.3
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#4/131Event board →
6
GP
16.5
PPG
11.0
RPG
1.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #25James MinlendG · Cameroonrank_below · #27Bryan Lionel N'goliSF · Côte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#26
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#24
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
16.5
PPG
11.0
RPG
1.8
APG
2.3
SPG
1.5
BPG
18%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #26
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.3
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
1.8
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.3
P79
Playmaking
0.3
P22
Rebounding
5.3
P74
True shooting
43%
P69
Two-way impact
+17.5
P80
Stops
68%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
22 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
7 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
36%
5 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 33●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
56
PTS
9.3 / game
22–59
FGM–FGA
7–26
3PM–3PA
5–14
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.18×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
32
REB
5.3 / game
15
OREB
17
DREB
5.3
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
12
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
80.3
HESI
76.9
PI
86.3
ORtg
68.8
DRtg
+17.5
NRtg
+9.4
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
4%
PIE
68.8
Team DRtg
+0.0
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.5
PPG
11.0
RPG
1.8
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.5
P97
Playmaking
1.8
P74
Rebounding
11.0
P96
True shooting
46%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
40 made / 92 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
3 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
16 made / 37 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
●2PA 75●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
99
PTS
16.5 / game
40–92
FGM–FGA
3–17
3PM–3PA
16–37
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.8 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.61×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
66
REB
11.0 / game
30
OREB
36
DREB
11.0
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
9
BLK
1.5 / game
15
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45%
eFG%
4%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.