ORtg
105.7
96th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Rakotomanga Nathan Andraina Pelimaro
Center · MAD · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
52.6% TSScoring efficiency · 88th event percentile
4.0 PPGScoring load · 42nd event percentile
- 83.2
- HESI v2.1
- #24
- of 138
- 46%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #24 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
83.2
Event performance
83rd event percentile
PI
78.1
Prospect index
83rd event percentile
ORtg
105.7
Points / 100 poss.
96th event percentile
DRtg
74.9
Lower is better
56th event percentile
NRtg
+30.8
Two-way margin
94th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 105.7 · 96th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 74.9 · Stop% 62.0% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
4 games · 51 minutes · 46% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
52.6% TS88th event percentile
Scoring load
4.0 PPG42nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
83.2
83rd event percentile
Prospect index
78.1
83rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
105.7
96th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.9
56th event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.8
94th event percentile
Stop percentage
62.0%
55th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
42nd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
17th event percentile
Rebounding
2.5 RPG
33rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
28th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.6% TS
88th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P96
Offensive Impact
105.7 ORtg · 96th event percentile
- P88
Event Impact
83.2 HESI performance · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 83rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 105.7 ORtg and 74.9 DRtg, producing a +30.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, defensive activity, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
105.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 94th event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.8 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 88th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 17th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 28th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 33rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.5 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
42nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.6%
88th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
53.8%
95th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
53.8%
97th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
40.0%
28th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
54.9%
98th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
17th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
74.9
56th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.4
51st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.0%
55th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
28th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+30.8
94th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+11.3
83rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
83.2
83rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
78.1
83rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.5%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.5 RPG
33rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
51.2
context12.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
46.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#24
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
4.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.3
APG
#24
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#24/138Event board →
4
GP
4.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#11/33Event board →
4
GP
7.3
PPG
4.0
RPG
0.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #23Rami MagdyPF · Egyptrank_below · #25James MinlendG · Cameroon
//current_rank
#24
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#22
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
4.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.3
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
53%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #24
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.3
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P42
Playmaking
0.3
P17
Rebounding
2.5
P33
True shooting
53%
P88
Two-way impact
+30.8
P94
Stops
62%
P55
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
54%
7 made / 13 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 13●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
4.0 / game
7–13
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–5
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
10
REB
2.5 / game
1
OREB
9
DREB
2.5
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.2
HESI
78.1
PI
105.7
ORtg
74.9
DRtg
+30.8
NRtg
+11.3
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
5%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
-1.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #11
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.3
PPG
4.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.3
P71
Playmaking
0.0
P9
Rebounding
4.0
P62
True shooting
64%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
62%
13 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
5% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
29
PTS
7.3 / game
13–21
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
10
OREB
6
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
62%
eFG%
5%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.