ORtg
102.5
93rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Rami Magdy
Power Forward · EGY · b. 2008
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer14.3 PPG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder8.2 RPG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact102.5 ORtg · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency49% TS on 14.3 PPG · 82nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
14.3 PPGScoring load · 94th event percentile
8.2 RPGRebounding · 93rd event percentile
- 83.9
- HESI v2.1
- #23
- of 138
- 72%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
6 public videos
Available for visual validation
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #23 of 138 · Established
HESI
83.9
Event performance
84th event percentile
PI
78.7
Prospect index
84th event percentile
ORtg
102.5
Points / 100 poss.
93rd event percentile
DRtg
84.5
Lower is better
34th event percentile
NRtg
+18.0
Two-way margin
81st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 102.5 · 93rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 84.5 · Stop% 62.4% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
6 games · 152 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
14.3 PPG94th event percentile
Rebounding
8.2 RPG93rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
83.9
84th event percentile
Prospect index
78.7
84th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
102.5
93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
84.5
34th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.0
81st event percentile
Stop percentage
62.4%
56th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
14.3 PPG
94th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
44th event percentile
Rebounding
8.2 RPG
93rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.8% TS
82nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P94
Scorer
14.3 PPG · 94th event percentile
- P93
Rebounder
8.2 RPG · 93rd event percentile
- P93
Offensive Impact
102.5 ORtg · 93rd event percentile
- P82
Event Efficiency
49% TS on 14.3 PPG · 82nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 84th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 102.5 ORtg and 84.5 DRtg, producing a +18.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, offensive efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 94th event percentile
Scoring load
14.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 93rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
102.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 93rd event percentile
Rebounding
8.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 34th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
84.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
14.3 PPG
94th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
48.8%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.1%
78th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.6%
73rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
29.8%
context7.8 attempts per game
Free throws
85.7%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.0%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
44th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
84.5
34th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.1
67th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.4%
56th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
57th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
39.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.0
81st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+11.4
84th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
83.9
84th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
78.7
84th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.7%
97th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.2 RPG
93rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
152.1
context25.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#23
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Highlight- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
03
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
14.3
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.8
APG
#23
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#12
RANK
70
FIELD
84%
PERCENTILE
16.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#23/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
14.3
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.8
APG
1.5
TOV/G
2.3
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
14.3
P94
Playmaking
0.8
P44
Rebounding
8.2
P93
True shooting
49%
P82
Two-way impact
+18.0
P81
Stops
62%
P56
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
30 made / 82 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
14 made / 47 attempts
FT
Free throws
86%
12 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 47
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
86
PTS
14.3 / game
30–82
FGM–FGA
14–47
3PM–3PA
12–14
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
49
REB
8.2 / game
20
OREB
29
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.9
HESI
78.7
PI
102.5
ORtg
84.5
DRtg
+18.0
NRtg
+11.4
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
12%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#12/70view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
0.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.5
P96
Playmaking
0.3
P20
Rebounding
7.3
P76
True shooting
47%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
24 made / 64 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
7 made / 25 attempts
FT
Free throws
85%
11 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 39●3PA 25
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
66
PTS
16.5 / game
24–64
FGM–FGA
7–25
3PM–3PA
11–13
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
12
TOV
3.0 / game
0.08×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
29
REB
7.3 / game
13
OREB
16
DREB
7.3
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
7
PF
12
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
43%
eFG%
4%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #22Bara DanfakhaSF · Senegalrank_below · #24Rakotomanga Nathan Andraina PelimaroC · Madagascar
//current_rank
#23
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#21
#22
#24
04
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
16.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
0.3
APG
2.5
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
47%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #23
//quick_read
The line at a glance
14.3
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.8
APG
1.5
TOV/G
2.3
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
14.3
P94
Playmaking
0.8
P44
Rebounding
8.2
P93
True shooting
49%
P82
Two-way impact
+18.0
P81
Stops
62%
P56
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
30 made / 82 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
14 made / 47 attempts
FT
Free throws
86%
12 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 47
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
86
PTS
14.3 / game
30–82
FGM–FGA
14–47
3PM–3PA
12–14
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
49
REB
8.2 / game
20
OREB
29
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.9
HESI
78.7
PI
102.5
ORtg
84.5
DRtg
+18.0
NRtg
+11.4
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
12%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #12
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
0.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.5
P96
Playmaking
0.3
P20
Rebounding
7.3
P76
True shooting
47%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
24 made / 64 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
7 made / 25 attempts
FT
Free throws
85%
11 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 39●3PA 25
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
66
PTS
16.5 / game
24–64
FGM–FGA
7–25
3PM–3PA
11–13
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
12
TOV
3.0 / game
0.08×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
29
REB
7.3 / game
13
OREB
16
DREB
7.3
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
7
PF
12
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
43%
eFG%
4%
PIE
05
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.