ORtg
116.5
93rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Olivia Jones
USA · b. 2009
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact116.5 ORtg · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact93.7 HESI performance · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalCreator3.1 APG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.1 APGCreation · 93rd event percentile
6.9 PPGScoring load · 67th event percentile
- 93.7
- HESI v2.1
- #13
- of 192
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #13 of 192 · Established
HESI
93.7
Event performance
93rd event percentile
PI
89.5
Prospect index
93rd event percentile
ORtg
116.5
Points / 100 poss.
93rd event percentile
DRtg
73.3
Lower is better
82nd event percentile
NRtg
+43.2
Two-way margin
92nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 116.5 · 93rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.3 · Stop% 52.4% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
7 games · 150 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
3.1 APG93rd event percentile
Scoring load
6.9 PPG67th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
93.7
93rd event percentile
Prospect index
89.5
93rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
116.5
93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.3
82nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+43.2
92nd event percentile
Stop percentage
52.4%
36th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.9 PPG
67th event percentile
Creation
3.1 APG
93rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.7 RPG
47th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.4 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.7% TS
66th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P93
Offensive Impact
116.5 ORtg · 93rd event percentile
- P93
Event Impact
93.7 HESI performance · 93rd event percentile
- P93
Creator
3.1 APG · 93rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 93rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 116.5 ORtg and 73.3 DRtg, producing a +43.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 93rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
116.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 93rd event percentile
Creation
3.1 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 92nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+43.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 36th event percentile
Defensive stops
52.4% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.9 PPG
67th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.7%
66th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
38.9%
54th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
49th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
29.4%
context2.4 attempts per game
Free throws
76.5%
80th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
52.8%
91st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.1 APG
93rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.3
82nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.9
13th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
52.4%
36th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.4 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+43.2
92nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+30.9
93rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
93.7
93rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
89.5
93rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.2%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.7 RPG
47th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
150.1
context21.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#13
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
6.9
PPG
2.7
RPG
3.1
APG
#13
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#13/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.9
PPG
2.7
RPG
3.1
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.9
P67
Playmaking
3.1
P93
Rebounding
2.7
P47
True shooting
46%
P66
Two-way impact
+43.2
P92
Stops
52%
P36
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
15 made / 45 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
13 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
6.9 / game
15–45
FGM–FGA
5–17
3PM–3PA
13–17
FTM–FTA
creation
22
AST
3.1 / game
7
TOV
1.0 / game
3.14×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
19
REB
2.7 / game
4
OREB
15
DREB
2.7
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.0 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
3
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
93.7
HESI
89.5
PI
116.5
ORtg
73.3
DRtg
+43.2
NRtg
+30.9
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
7%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#11
Spain
4.7 PPG 8.1 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalActivity8.1 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#12
#14
JPN
18.1 PPG 2.4 RPG 4.9 APG
//event_signalScorer18.1 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
6.9
PPG
2.7
RPG
3.1
APG
1.0
SPG
0.4
BPG
29%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #13
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.9
PPG
2.7
RPG
3.1
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.9
P67
Playmaking
3.1
P93
Rebounding
2.7
P47
True shooting
46%
P66
Two-way impact
+43.2
P92
Stops
52%
P36
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
15 made / 45 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
13 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
6.9 / game
15–45
FGM–FGA
5–17
3PM–3PA
13–17
FTM–FTA
creation
22
AST
3.1 / game
7
TOV
1.0 / game
3.14×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
19
REB
2.7 / game
4
OREB
15
DREB
2.7
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.0 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
3
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
93.7
HESI
89.5
PI
116.5
ORtg
73.3
DRtg
+43.2
NRtg
+30.9
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
7%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.