ORtg
108.9
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
ESP · b. 2009
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
8.1 RPGRebounding · 97th event percentile
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 74th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #11 of 192 · Established
HESI
94.8
Event performance
95th event percentile
PI
90.3
Prospect index
95th event percentile
ORtg
108.9
Points / 100 poss.
89th event percentile
DRtg
59.2
Lower is better
98th event percentile
NRtg
+49.7
Two-way margin
95th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 108.9 · 89th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.2 · Stop% 80.0% · Team DRtg 63.6
Sample context
7 games · 105 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
94.8
95th event percentile
Prospect index
90.3
95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
108.9
89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.2
98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+49.7
95th event percentile
Stop percentage
80.0%
94th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
4.7 PPG
52nd event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
53rd event percentile
Rebounding
8.1 RPG
97th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
74th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.0% TS
39th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
8.1 RPG · 97th event percentile
Defensive Impact
59.2 DRtg · 80% Stop% · 96th event percentile
Event Impact
94.8 HESI performance · 95th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+49.7 Net Rating · 93rd event percentile
Offensive Impact
108.9 ORtg · 89th event percentile
Activity
8.1 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/G · 81st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 108.9 ORtg and 59.2 DRtg, producing a +49.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.
Defensive efficiency
59.2 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Rebounding
8.1 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Two-way margin
+49.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Scoring efficiency
38.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
108.9
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
4.7 PPG
52nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.0%
39th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
38.5%
51st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.5%
66th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
30.0%
14th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
54.3%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
53rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.2
98th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
63.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.4
88th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
80.0%
94th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
74th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+49.7
95th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+31.7
95th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
94.8
95th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
90.3
95th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
10.4%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.1 RPG
97th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
104.7
context15.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
63.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#11
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
530.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
4.7
PPG
8.1
RPG
1.3
APG
#11
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
4.7
PPG
8.1
RPG
1.3
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.7
P52
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
8.1
P97
True shooting
38%
P39
Two-way impact
+49.7
P95
Stops
80%
P94
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
39%
15 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
33
PTS
4.7 / game
15–39
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
3–10
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.3 / game
3
TOV
0.4 / game
3.00×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
57
REB
8.1 / game
39
OREB
18
DREB
8.1
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.6 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
7
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
94.8
HESI
90.3
PI
108.9
ORtg
59.2
DRtg
+49.7
NRtg
+31.7
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
54%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
10%
PIE
63.6
Team DRtg
+4.4
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#11
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
4.7
PPG
8.1
RPG
1.3
APG
1.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
—
3P%
38%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #11
//quick_read
4.7
PPG
8.1
RPG
1.3
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.7
P52
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
8.1
P97
True shooting
38%
P39
Two-way impact
+49.7
P95
Stops
80%
P94
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
39%
15 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
33
PTS
4.7 / game
15–39
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
3–10
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.3 / game
3
TOV
0.4 / game
3.00×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
57
REB
8.1 / game
39
OREB
18
DREB
8.1
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.6 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
7
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
94.8
HESI
90.3
PI
108.9
ORtg
59.2
DRtg
+49.7
NRtg
+31.7
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
54%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
10%
PIE
63.6
Team DRtg
+4.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.