ORtg
111.1
91st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Ana Maria Hernanz
ESP · b. 2009
//measurables
182 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Impact96.3 HESI performance · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact111.1 ORtg · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+47.4 Net Rating · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDefensive Impact63.6 DRtg · 69% Stop% · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
5.0 RPGRebounding · 80th event percentile
6.6 PPGScoring load · 65th event percentile
- 96.3
- HESI v2.1
- #9
- of 192
- 70%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #9 of 192 · Established
HESI
96.3
Event performance
96th event percentile
PI
91.6
Prospect index
96th event percentile
ORtg
111.1
Points / 100 poss.
91st event percentile
DRtg
63.6
Lower is better
94th event percentile
NRtg
+47.4
Two-way margin
93rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 111.1 · 91st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.6 · Stop% 69.4% · Team DRtg 63.6
Sample context
7 games · 142 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
5.0 RPG80th event percentile
Scoring load
6.6 PPG65th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
96.3
96th event percentile
Prospect index
91.6
96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
111.1
91st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.6
94th event percentile
Two-way margin
+47.4
93rd event percentile
Stop percentage
69.4%
81st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.6 PPG
65th event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG
62nd event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
80th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
53rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.6% TS
56th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Event Impact
96.3 HESI performance · 95th event percentile
- P91
Offensive Impact
111.1 ORtg · 91st event percentile
- P91
Two-Way Impact
+47.4 Net Rating · 91st event percentile
- P88
Defensive Impact
63.6 DRtg · 69% Stop% · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 96th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 111.1 ORtg and 63.6 DRtg, producing a +47.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 94th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.6 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+47.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
111.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.6 PPG
65th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.6%
56th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
43.1%
66th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.3%
55th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context5.1 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
35th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.4%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.6 APG
62nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.6
94th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
63.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.1
67th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
69.4%
81st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
53rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
37.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+47.4
93rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+33.4
96th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
96.3
96th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
91.6
96th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.1%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
80th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
142.1
context20.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#9
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
530.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
6.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.6
APG
#9
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#9/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.6
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.6
P65
Playmaking
1.6
P62
Rebounding
5.0
P80
True shooting
44%
P56
Two-way impact
+47.4
P93
Stops
69%
P81
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
18 made / 51 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
8 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 36
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
46
PTS
6.6 / game
18–51
FGM–FGA
8–36
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.6 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
2.20×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
20
OREB
15
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
21
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
96.3
HESI
91.6
PI
111.1
ORtg
63.6
DRtg
+47.4
NRtg
+33.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
7%
PIE
63.6
Team DRtg
-0.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #8Tatianna GriffinUnited Statesrank_below · #10Maliya HunterUnited States
//current_rank
#9
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#7
United States
8.0 PPG 9.1 RPG 1.4 APG
//event_signalRebounder9.1 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#8
United States
9.9 PPG 4.4 RPG 2.4 APG
//event_signalShooter41% 3PT on 2.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#10
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
6.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.6
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
22%
3P%
44%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.6
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.6
P65
Playmaking
1.6
P62
Rebounding
5.0
P80
True shooting
44%
P56
Two-way impact
+47.4
P93
Stops
69%
P81
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
18 made / 51 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
8 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 36
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
46
PTS
6.6 / game
18–51
FGM–FGA
8–36
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.6 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
2.20×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
20
OREB
15
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
21
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
96.3
HESI
91.6
PI
111.1
ORtg
63.6
DRtg
+47.4
NRtg
+33.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
7%
PIE
63.6
Team DRtg
-0.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.