ORtg
119.5
96th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Tatianna Griffin
USA · b. 2010
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Impact95.8 HESI performance · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact119.5 ORtg · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency56% TS on 9.9 PPG · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+50.3 Net Rating · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
55.5% TSScoring efficiency · 90th event percentile
9.9 PPGScoring load · 82nd event percentile
- 95.8
- HESI v2.1
- #8
- of 192
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #8 of 192 · Established
HESI
95.8
Event performance
96th event percentile
PI
92.3
Prospect index
96th event percentile
ORtg
119.5
Points / 100 poss.
96th event percentile
DRtg
69.2
Lower is better
89th event percentile
NRtg
+50.3
Two-way margin
96th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 119.5 · 96th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 69.2 · Stop% 62.2% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
7 games · 114 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
55.5% TS90th event percentile
Scoring load
9.9 PPG82nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
95.8
96th event percentile
Prospect index
92.3
96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
119.5
96th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
69.2
89th event percentile
Two-way margin
+50.3
96th event percentile
Stop percentage
62.2%
67th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.9 PPG
82nd event percentile
Creation
2.4 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
4.4 RPG
74th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
53rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.5% TS
90th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P96
Event Impact
95.8 HESI performance · 96th event percentile
- P96
Offensive Impact
119.5 ORtg · 96th event percentile
- P90
Event Efficiency
56% TS on 9.9 PPG · 90th event percentile
- P90
Two-Way Impact
+50.3 Net Rating · 90th event percentile
Shooter
41% 3PT on 2.4 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 96th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 119.5 ORtg and 69.2 DRtg, producing a +50.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
119.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 96th event percentile
Two-way margin
+50.3 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 90th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.9 PPG
82nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
55.5%
90th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
56.3%
96th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
94th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
41.2%
context2.4 attempts per game
Free throws
42.9%
24th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
55.6%
95th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.4 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
69.2
89th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.7
47th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.2%
67th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
53rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+50.3
96th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+33.0
96th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
95.8
96th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
92.3
96th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.0%
91st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.4 RPG
74th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
114.0
context16.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#8
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
9.9
PPG
4.4
RPG
2.4
APG
#8
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#8/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.9
PPG
4.4
RPG
2.4
APG
1.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.9
P82
Playmaking
2.4
P80
Rebounding
4.4
P74
True shooting
56%
P90
Two-way impact
+50.3
P96
Stops
62%
P67
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
28 made / 56 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
41%
7 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 39●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
69
PTS
9.9 / game
28–56
FGM–FGA
7–17
3PM–3PA
6–14
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.4 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
1.89×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
31
REB
4.4 / game
11
OREB
20
DREB
4.4
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
95.8
HESI
92.3
PI
119.5
ORtg
69.2
DRtg
+50.3
NRtg
+33.0
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
56%
eFG%
9%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-2.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #7Nation WilliamsUnited Statesrank_below · #9Ana Maria HernanzSpain
//current_rank
#8
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#6
Spain
17.0 PPG 2.3 RPG 4.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.9 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#7
United States
8.0 PPG 9.1 RPG 1.4 APG
//event_signalRebounder9.1 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#9
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
9.9
PPG
4.4
RPG
2.4
APG
0.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
41%
3P%
56%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.9
PPG
4.4
RPG
2.4
APG
1.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.9
P82
Playmaking
2.4
P80
Rebounding
4.4
P74
True shooting
56%
P90
Two-way impact
+50.3
P96
Stops
62%
P67
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
28 made / 56 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
41%
7 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 39●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
69
PTS
9.9 / game
28–56
FGM–FGA
7–17
3PM–3PA
6–14
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.4 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
1.89×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
31
REB
4.4 / game
11
OREB
20
DREB
4.4
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
95.8
HESI
92.3
PI
119.5
ORtg
69.2
DRtg
+50.3
NRtg
+33.0
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
56%
eFG%
9%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-2.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.