Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Nation Williams

USA · b. 2009

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

4.6 stocksDefensive activity · 98th event percentile

9.1 RPGRebounding · 98th event percentile

97.4
HESI v2.1: #7
of 192: 67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #7 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

97.4

Event performance

97th event percentile

92.4

Prospect index

97th event percentile

ORtg

101.7

Points / 100 poss.

82nd event percentile

DRtg

48.1

Lower is better

99th event percentile

NRtg

+53.6

Two-way margin

97th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 101.7 · 82nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 48.1 · Stop% 1.1% · Team DRtg 66.5

Sample context

7 games · 123 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

4.6 stocks98th event percentile

Rebounding

9.1 RPG98th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

97.4

97th event percentile

Prospect index

92.4

97th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

101.7

82nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

48.1

99th event percentile

Two-way margin

+53.6

97th event percentile

Stop percentage

112.1%

99th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.0 PPG

76th event percentile

Creation

1.4 APG

58th event percentile

Rebounding

9.1 RPG

98th event percentile

Defensive activity

4.6 stocks

98th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

37.6% TS

37th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P99
Defensive Impact
48.1 DRtg · 112% Stop% · 99th event percentile
P99
Rim Protection
1.9 BPG · 99th event percentile
P98
Disruptor
4.6 steals + blocks per game · 98th event percentile
P98
Activity
9.1 RPG + 4.6 defensive plays/G · 98th event percentile
P98
Rebounder
9.1 RPG · 98th event percentile
P97
Event Impact
97.4 HESI performance · 97th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 97th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 101.7 ORtg and 48.1 DRtg, producing a +53.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and defensive activity. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
48.1 DRtg
99th event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
1.1% Stop%
99th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive activity
4.6 steals + blocks/G
98th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
37.6% TS
37th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

101.7

82nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.0 PPG

76th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

37.6%

37th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

31.7%

33rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

31.7%

41st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.3 attempts per game

Free throws

61.5%

54th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

51.4%

90th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.4 APG

58th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

48.1

99th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

66.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+18.4

99th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

1.1%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

4.6 STL+BLK

98th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

55.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+53.6

97th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+36.1

97th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

97.4

97th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

92.4

97th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.2%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

9.1 RPG

98th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

123.3

context

17.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

564.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

8.0

PPG

9.1

RPG

1.4

APG

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#7/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.0

PPG

9.1

RPG

1.4

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

38%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.0

P76

Playmaking

1.4

P58

Rebounding

9.1

P98

True shooting

38%

P37

Two-way impact

+53.6

P97

Stops

P99

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

32%

20 made / 63 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

62%

16 made / 26 attempts

Shot selection

3% of attempts from three

●2PA 61●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

8.0 / game

20–63

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

16–26

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.4 / game

TOV

1.3 / game

1.11×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

9.1 / game

OREB

DREB

9.1

REB/G

defense

STL

2.7 / game

BLK

1.9 / game

STL+BLK

4.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

97.4

HESI

92.4

101.7

ORtg

48.1

DRtg

+53.6

NRtg

+36.1

Stable NRtg

Stop%

51%

Floor%

32%

eFG%

PIE

66.5

Team DRtg

+18.4

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #6Isabel HernandezSpain

//current_rank

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #8Tatianna GriffinUnited States

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

8.0

PPG

9.1

RPG

1.4

APG

2.7

SPG

1.9

BPG

3P%

38%

TS%

event_stats