ORtg
127.7
98th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Maliya Hunter
USA · b. 2009
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact127.7 ORtg · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact95.3 HESI performance · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
50.8% TSScoring efficiency · 82nd event percentile
3.8 RPGRebounding · 66th event percentile
- 95.3
- HESI v2.1
- #10
- of 192
- 60%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #10 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
95.3
Event performance
95th event percentile
PI
90.7
Prospect index
95th event percentile
ORtg
127.7
Points / 100 poss.
98th event percentile
DRtg
74.8
Lower is better
77th event percentile
NRtg
+52.8
Two-way margin
97th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 127.7 · 98th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 74.8 · Stop% 48.8% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
6 games · 90 minutes · 60% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS82nd event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG66th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
95.3
95th event percentile
Prospect index
90.7
95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
127.7
98th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.8
77th event percentile
Two-way margin
+52.8
97th event percentile
Stop percentage
48.8%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.2 PPG
55th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
43rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS
82nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Offensive Impact
127.7 ORtg · 98th event percentile
- P96
Event Impact
95.3 HESI performance · 96th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 127.7 ORtg and 74.8 DRtg, producing a +52.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and creation.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
127.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+52.8 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Defensive stops
48.8% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 29th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.2 PPG
55th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.8%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.1%
82nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
48.1%
92nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
62.5%
56th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
64.0%
99th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
74.8
77th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-8.3
5th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
48.8%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
43rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
17.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+52.8
97th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+31.8
95th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
95.3
95th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
90.7
95th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.4%
73rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
90.1
context15.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#10
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
6
GP
5.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
#10
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#10/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.2
P55
Playmaking
0.7
P29
Rebounding
3.8
P66
True shooting
51%
P82
Two-way impact
+52.8
P97
Stops
49%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
13 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
22% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
31
PTS
5.2 / game
13–27
FGM–FGA
0–6
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
2
TOV
0.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
14
OREB
9
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
95.3
HESI
90.7
PI
127.7
ORtg
74.8
DRtg
+52.8
NRtg
+31.8
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
64%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
4%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #9Ana Maria HernanzSpainrank_below · #11Anna SmykovskaiaSpain
//current_rank
#10
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#8
United States
9.9 PPG 4.4 RPG 2.4 APG
//event_signalShooter41% 3PT on 2.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#9
#11
Spain
4.7 PPG 8.1 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalActivity8.1 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
5.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
0.5
SPG
0.2
BPG
0%
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #10
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.2
P55
Playmaking
0.7
P29
Rebounding
3.8
P66
True shooting
51%
P82
Two-way impact
+52.8
P97
Stops
49%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
13 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
22% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
31
PTS
5.2 / game
13–27
FGM–FGA
0–6
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
2
TOV
0.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
14
OREB
9
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
95.3
HESI
90.7
PI
127.7
ORtg
74.8
DRtg
+52.8
NRtg
+31.8
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
64%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
4%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.