ORtg
79.8
61st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Nathan Benjamin Aboghe Aboghe
Power Forward · GAB · b. 2008
//measurables
197 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 72nd event percentile
3.8 RPGRebounding · 53rd event percentile
- 35.8
- HESI v2.1
- #89
- of 138
- 63%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #89 of 138 · Established
HESI
35.8
Event performance
36th event percentile
PI
40.1
Prospect index
36th event percentile
ORtg
79.8
Points / 100 poss.
61st event percentile
DRtg
94.4
Lower is better
8th event percentile
NRtg
-14.6
Two-way margin
40th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 79.8 · 61st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 94.4 · Stop% 59.4% · Team DRtg 96.4
Sample context
5 games · 101 minutes · 63% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks72nd event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG53rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
35.8
36th event percentile
Prospect index
40.1
36th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.8
61st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
94.4
8th event percentile
Two-way margin
-14.6
40th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.4%
45th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.4 PPG
52nd event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
34th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
53rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.0% TS
42nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P87
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 36th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.8 ORtg and 94.4 DRtg, producing a -14.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and creation.
Relative strengths
- 72nd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 8th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
94.4 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 34th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.4 PPG
52nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
35.0%
42nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.6%
28th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.0%
32nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
7.1%
context2.8 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
73rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.3%
70th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
34th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
94.4
8th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.9
75th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.4%
45th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
72nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
26.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-14.6
40th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-11.1
36th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
35.8
36th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
40.1
36th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.2%
46th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
53rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
100.5
context20.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#89
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
441.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.4
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.6
APG
#89
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#37
RANK
57
FIELD
36%
PERCENTILE
4.2
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#89/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.4
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.6
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.4
P52
Playmaking
0.6
P34
Rebounding
3.8
P53
True shooting
35%
P42
Two-way impact
-14.6
P40
Stops
59%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
8 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
10 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
27
PTS
5.4 / game
8–32
FGM–FGA
1–14
3PM–3PA
10–15
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.6 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.8 / game
3
OREB
16
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
5
BLK
1.0 / game
11
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
35.8
HESI
40.1
PI
79.8
ORtg
94.4
DRtg
-14.6
NRtg
-11.1
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
2%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
+1.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#37/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.2
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.2
P48
Playmaking
0.3
P28
Rebounding
3.5
P47
True shooting
31%
P28
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
7 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
4 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
7 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
25
PTS
4.2 / game
7–36
FGM–FGA
4–16
3PM–3PA
7–11
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.5 / game
5
OREB
16
DREB
3.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
25%
eFG%
1%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #88Daryll Georges MbiguisPF · Gabonrank_below · #90Mohamed Yassine Ben GharsallahF · Tunisia
//current_rank
#89
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#87
#88
#90
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
4.2
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.3
APG
1.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
—
3P%
31%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #89
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.4
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.6
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.4
P52
Playmaking
0.6
P34
Rebounding
3.8
P53
True shooting
35%
P42
Two-way impact
-14.6
P40
Stops
59%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
8 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
10 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
27
PTS
5.4 / game
8–32
FGM–FGA
1–14
3PM–3PA
10–15
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.6 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.8 / game
3
OREB
16
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
5
BLK
1.0 / game
11
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
35.8
HESI
40.1
PI
79.8
ORtg
94.4
DRtg
-14.6
NRtg
-11.1
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
2%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
+1.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #37
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.2
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.2
P48
Playmaking
0.3
P28
Rebounding
3.5
P47
True shooting
31%
P28
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
7 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
4 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
7 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
25
PTS
4.2 / game
7–36
FGM–FGA
4–16
3PM–3PA
7–11
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.5 / game
5
OREB
16
DREB
3.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
25%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.