ORtg
89.2
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Daryll Georges Mbiguis
Power Forward · GAB · b. 2008
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer16.2 PPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
16.2 PPGScoring load · 97th event percentile
43.1% TSScoring efficiency · 70th event percentile
- 37.2
- HESI v2.1
- #88
- of 138
- 73%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #88 of 138 · Established
HESI
37.2
Event performance
37th event percentile
PI
41.3
Prospect index
37th event percentile
ORtg
89.2
Points / 100 poss.
81st event percentile
DRtg
101.7
Lower is better
3rd event percentile
NRtg
-12.5
Two-way margin
43rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 89.2 · 81st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 101.7 · Stop% 42.3% · Team DRtg 96.4
Sample context
5 games · 158 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
16.2 PPG97th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.1% TS70th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
37.2
37th event percentile
Prospect index
41.3
37th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
89.2
81st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
101.7
3rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-12.5
43rd event percentile
Stop percentage
42.3%
9th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
16.2 PPG
97th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.4 stocks
63rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.1% TS
70th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Scorer
16.2 PPG · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 37th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.2 ORtg and 101.7 DRtg, producing a -12.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Scoring load
16.2 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 81st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
89.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 70th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 3rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
101.7 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 9th event percentile
Defensive stops
42.3% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 40th event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
16.2 PPG
97th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.1%
70th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.1%
68th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.2%
51st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
34.7%
context9.8 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
73rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.2%
57th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
101.7
3rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.3
22nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
42.3%
9th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.4 STL+BLK
63rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
29.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-12.5
43rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-10.5
37th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
37.2
37th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
41.3
37th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.9%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.0 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
158.3
context31.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#88
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
441.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
16.2
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#88
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#12
RANK
57
FIELD
80%
PERCENTILE
13.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#88/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.2
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.0
APG
2.4
TOV/G
3.4
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.2
P97
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.0
P40
True shooting
43%
P70
Two-way impact
-12.5
P43
Stops
42%
P9
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
26 made / 86 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
17 made / 49 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
12 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 37●3PA 49
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
81
PTS
16.2 / game
26–86
FGM–FGA
17–49
3PM–3PA
12–18
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.42×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.0 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
8
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.2
HESI
41.3
PI
89.2
ORtg
101.7
DRtg
-12.5
NRtg
-10.5
Stable NRtg
42%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
4%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
-5.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#12/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.0
P82
Playmaking
1.7
P69
Rebounding
3.0
P42
True shooting
46%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
28 made / 79 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
13 made / 39 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
9 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 39
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
78
PTS
13.0 / game
28–79
FGM–FGA
13–39
3PM–3PA
9–14
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
18
REB
3.0 / game
3
OREB
15
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44%
eFG%
4%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #87Gang-Non Emmanuel DegotoPG · Chadrank_below · #89Nathan Benjamin Aboghe AboghePF · Gabon
//current_rank
#88
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.- #86
#87
#89
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
13.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.7
APG
1.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #88
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.2
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.0
APG
2.4
TOV/G
3.4
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.2
P97
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.0
P40
True shooting
43%
P70
Two-way impact
-12.5
P43
Stops
42%
P9
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
26 made / 86 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
17 made / 49 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
12 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 37●3PA 49
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
81
PTS
16.2 / game
26–86
FGM–FGA
17–49
3PM–3PA
12–18
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.42×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.0 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
8
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.2
HESI
41.3
PI
89.2
ORtg
101.7
DRtg
-12.5
NRtg
-10.5
Stable NRtg
42%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
4%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
-5.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #12
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.0
P82
Playmaking
1.7
P69
Rebounding
3.0
P42
True shooting
46%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
28 made / 79 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
13 made / 39 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
9 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 39
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
78
PTS
13.0 / game
28–79
FGM–FGA
13–39
3PM–3PA
9–14
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
18
REB
3.0 / game
3
OREB
15
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44%
eFG%
4%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.