ORtg
77.6
56th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Jean Vianney Mbeyame
Power Forward · GAB
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalActivity6.0 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/G · 76th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
6.0 RPGRebounding · 80th event percentile
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 74th event percentile
- 39.4
- HESI v2.1
- #86
- of 138
- 53%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #86 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
39.4
Event performance
39th event percentile
PI
43.0
Prospect index
38th event percentile
ORtg
77.6
Points / 100 poss.
56th event percentile
DRtg
90.5
Lower is better
16th event percentile
NRtg
-12.9
Two-way margin
42nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 77.6 · 56th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.5 · Stop% 68.5% · Team DRtg 96.4
Sample context
5 games · 68 minutes · 53% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.0 RPG80th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks74th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
39.4
39th event percentile
Prospect index
43.0
38th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
77.6
56th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.5
16th event percentile
Two-way margin
-12.9
42nd event percentile
Stop percentage
68.5%
74th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.4 PPG
36th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
34th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
80th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
74th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.0% TS
69th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P76
Activity
6.0 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/G · 76th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 39th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.6 ORtg and 90.5 DRtg, producing a -12.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive activity, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, creation, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 74th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 74th event percentile
Defensive stops
68.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 16th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 34th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 36th event percentile
Scoring load
3.4 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.4 PPG
36th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.0%
69th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.4%
76th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
44.4%
87th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
25.0%
10th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.0%
68th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
34th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.5
16th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.8
91st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.5%
74th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
74th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
20.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-12.9
42nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-9.4
39th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
39.4
39th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
43.0
38th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.1%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.0 RPG
80th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
68.4
context13.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
53.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#86
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
441.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
3.4
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
#86
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#29
RANK
57
FIELD
50%
PERCENTILE
3.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#86/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.4
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.4
P36
Playmaking
0.6
P34
Rebounding
6.0
P80
True shooting
43%
P69
Two-way impact
-12.9
P42
Stops
69%
P74
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
8 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
17
PTS
3.4 / game
8–18
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.6 / game
8
TOV
1.6 / game
0.38×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
30
REB
6.0 / game
19
OREB
11
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
4
BLK
0.8 / game
7
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
39.4
HESI
43.0
PI
77.6
ORtg
90.5
DRtg
-12.9
NRtg
-9.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
4%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
+5.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#29/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.5
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.5
P44
Playmaking
0.2
P16
Rebounding
6.2
P75
True shooting
49%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
8 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.5 / game
8–18
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
0.10×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
19
OREB
18
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44%
eFG%
1%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #85Louey MansourTunisiarank_below · #87Gang-Non Emmanuel DegotoPG · Chad
//current_rank
#86
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#84
#85
#87
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.5
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
49%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #86
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.4
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.4
P36
Playmaking
0.6
P34
Rebounding
6.0
P80
True shooting
43%
P69
Two-way impact
-12.9
P42
Stops
69%
P74
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
8 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
17
PTS
3.4 / game
8–18
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.6 / game
8
TOV
1.6 / game
0.38×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
30
REB
6.0 / game
19
OREB
11
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
4
BLK
0.8 / game
7
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
39.4
HESI
43.0
PI
77.6
ORtg
90.5
DRtg
-12.9
NRtg
-9.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
4%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
+5.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #29
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.5
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.5
P44
Playmaking
0.2
P16
Rebounding
6.2
P75
True shooting
49%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
8 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.5 / game
8–18
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
0.10×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
19
OREB
18
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.