back_to_rankings
Louey Mansour portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Louey Mansour

TUN · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

190 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.6 stocksDefensive activity · 42nd event percentile

32.1% TSScoring efficiency · 32nd event percentile

36.5
HESI v2.1
#85
of 138
44%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

3 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #85 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

36.5

Event performance

37th event percentile

PI

43.1

Prospect index

39th event percentile

ORtg

59.1

Points / 100 poss.

27th event percentile

DRtg

77.0

Lower is better

53rd event percentile

NRtg

-17.9

Two-way margin

36th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 59.1 · 27th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 77.0 · Stop% 54.6% · Team DRtg 72.7

Sample context

5 games · 47 minutes · 44% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

32.1% TS32nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

36.5

37th event percentile

Prospect index

43.1

39th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

59.1

27th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

77.0

53rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-17.9

36th event percentile

Stop percentage

54.6%

34th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.8 PPG

23rd event percentile

Creation

0.2 APG

14th event percentile

Rebounding

1.4 RPG

18th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

32.1% TS

32nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 37th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 59.1 ORtg and 77.0 DRtg, producing a -17.9 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, rebounding, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.2 APG

    14th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Rebounding

    1.4 RPG

    18th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  3. Scoring load

    1.8 PPG

    23rd event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

59.1

27th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.8 PPG

23rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

32.1%

32nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

32.1%

44th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

28.6%

45th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

20.0%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Floor%

26.3%

23rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.2 APG

14th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

77.0

53rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.3

32nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.6%

34th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.6 STL+BLK

42nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

10.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-17.9

36th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-10.8

37th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

36.5

37th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

43.1

39th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.0%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.4 RPG

18th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

47.1

context

9.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

44.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#85

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

476.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.2

APG

#85

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#37

RANK

131

FIELD

72%

PERCENTILE

7.4

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.2

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

5

GP

7.4

PPG

5.4

RPG

1.6

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

3

GP

6.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.3

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Abdoul Yvan Hanaffi portrait#83

    Abdoul Yvan Hanaffi

    Small Forward · Madagascar

    6.0 PPG 4.5 RPG 0.5 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

7.4

PPG

5.4

RPG

1.6

APG

2.8

SPG

0.2

BPG

18%

3P%

37%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #85

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.2

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

32%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P23

Playmaking

0.2

P14

Rebounding

1.4

P18

True shooting

32%

P32

Two-way impact

-17.9

P36

Stops

55%

P34

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

29%

4 made / 14 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

36% of attempts from three

●2PA 9●3PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.8 / game

4–14

FGM–FGA

1–5

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.2 / game

4

TOV

0.8 / game

0.25×

AST:TOV

1

FD

rebounding

7

REB

1.4 / game

3

OREB

4

DREB

1.4

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

4

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

36.5

HESI

43.1

PI

59.1

ORtg

77.0

DRtg

-17.9

NRtg

-10.8

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

26%

Floor%

32%

eFG%

0%

PIE

72.7

Team DRtg

-4.3

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games47 minutes9.4 min/game44% sample weightrank #85 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026

3 GP · event rank #20

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.3

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.0

P65

Playmaking

1.3

P49

Rebounding

2.0

P19

True shooting

39%

P50

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

28%

5 made / 18 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

6 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

56% of attempts from three

●2PA 8●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

18

PTS

6.0 / game

5–18

FGM–FGA

2–10

3PM–3PA

6–12

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

1.3 / game

3

TOV

1.0 / game

1.33×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

6

REB

2.0 / game

4

OREB

2

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

3

STL

1.0 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

6

PF

4

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

33%

eFG%

0%

PIE

sample_context

3 gamesrank #20 of 34

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

5 GP · event rank #37

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.4

PPG

5.4

RPG

1.6

APG

2.6

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.4

P71

Playmaking

1.6

P71

Rebounding

5.4

P66

True shooting

37%

P60

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

34%

16 made / 47 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

4 made / 22 attempts

FT

Free throws

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

47% of attempts from three

●2PA 25●3PA 22

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

37

PTS

7.4 / game

16–47

FGM–FGA

4–22

3PM–3PA

1–6

FTM–FTA

creation

8

AST

1.6 / game

13

TOV

2.6 / game

0.62×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

27

REB

5.4 / game

6

OREB

21

DREB

5.4

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.8 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

8

PF

15

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

38%

eFG%

1%

PIE

sample_context

5 gamesrank #37 of 131

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.