ORtg
59.1
27th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
TUN · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.6 stocksDefensive activity · 42nd event percentile
32.1% TSScoring efficiency · 32nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #85 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
36.5
Event performance
37th event percentile
PI
43.1
Prospect index
39th event percentile
ORtg
59.1
Points / 100 poss.
27th event percentile
DRtg
77.0
Lower is better
53rd event percentile
NRtg
-17.9
Two-way margin
36th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 59.1 · 27th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 77.0 · Stop% 54.6% · Team DRtg 72.7
Sample context
5 games · 47 minutes · 44% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
36.5
37th event percentile
Prospect index
43.1
39th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
59.1
27th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
77.0
53rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-17.9
36th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.6%
34th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
23rd event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
14th event percentile
Rebounding
1.4 RPG
18th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
42nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.1% TS
32nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 37th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 59.1 ORtg and 77.0 DRtg, producing a -17.9 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, rebounding, and scoring load.
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Rebounding
1.4 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
59.1
27th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
1.8 PPG
23rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
32.1%
32nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
32.1%
44th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
28.6%
45th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context1.0 attempts per game
Floor%
26.3%
23rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
14th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
77.0
53rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.3
32nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.6%
34th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
42nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
10.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-17.9
36th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-10.8
37th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
36.5
37th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
43.1
39th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.0%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.4 RPG
18th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
47.1
context9.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
44.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#85
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
476.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
1.8
PPG
1.4
RPG
0.2
APG
#85
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#37
RANK
131
FIELD
72%
PERCENTILE
7.4
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
1.8
PPG
1.4
RPG
0.2
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
5
GP
7.4
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.6
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
3
GP
6.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#85
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
7.4
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.6
APG
2.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
18%
3P%
37%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #85
//quick_read
1.8
PPG
1.4
RPG
0.2
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.8
P23
Playmaking
0.2
P14
Rebounding
1.4
P18
True shooting
32%
P32
Two-way impact
-17.9
P36
Stops
55%
P34
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
9
PTS
1.8 / game
4–14
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
0.25×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.4 / game
3
OREB
4
DREB
1.4
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.4 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
36.5
HESI
43.1
PI
59.1
ORtg
77.0
DRtg
-17.9
NRtg
-10.8
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
26%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
0%
PIE
72.7
Team DRtg
-4.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026
3 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
6.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.0
P65
Playmaking
1.3
P49
Rebounding
2.0
P19
True shooting
39%
P50
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
6 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
56% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
18
PTS
6.0 / game
5–18
FGM–FGA
2–10
3PM–3PA
6–12
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.3 / game
3
TOV
1.0 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
6
REB
2.0 / game
4
OREB
2
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
1.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
33%
eFG%
0%
PIE
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
5 GP · event rank #37
//quick_read
7.4
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.6
APG
2.6
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.4
P71
Playmaking
1.6
P71
Rebounding
5.4
P66
True shooting
37%
P60
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
34%
16 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
4 made / 22 attempts
FT
Free throws
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
37
PTS
7.4 / game
16–47
FGM–FGA
4–22
3PM–3PA
1–6
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
13
TOV
2.6 / game
0.62×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
27
REB
5.4 / game
6
OREB
21
DREB
5.4
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.8 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
8
PF
15
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
38%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.