ORtg
61.7
33rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Abdoul Yvan Hanaffi
Small Forward · MAD · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
193 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
4.5 RPGRebounding · 63rd event percentile
6.0 PPGScoring load · 58th event percentile
- 38.7
- HESI v2.1
- #83
- of 138
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #83 of 138 · Established
HESI
38.7
Event performance
39th event percentile
PI
43.6
Prospect index
40th event percentile
ORtg
61.7
Points / 100 poss.
33rd event percentile
DRtg
73.3
Lower is better
61st event percentile
NRtg
-11.6
Two-way margin
44th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 61.7 · 33rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.3 · Stop% 65.8% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
6 games · 113 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
4.5 RPG63rd event percentile
Scoring load
6.0 PPG58th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
38.7
39th event percentile
Prospect index
43.6
40th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
61.7
33rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.3
61st event percentile
Two-way margin
-11.6
44th event percentile
Stop percentage
65.8%
66th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.0 PPG
58th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
63rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.1% TS
43rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 39th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 61.7 ORtg and 73.3 DRtg, producing a -11.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are creation and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 66th event percentile
Defensive stops
65.8% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 29th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 33rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
61.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.0 PPG
58th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
35.1%
43rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.7%
50th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.4%
52nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
41.7%
30th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.5%
32nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.3
61st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.2
60th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.8%
66th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
57th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
29.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-11.6
44th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-9.5
39th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
38.7
39th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
43.6
40th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.8%
40th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
63rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
112.5
context18.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#83
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
#83
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#8
RANK
33
FIELD
78%
PERCENTILE
8.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#83/138Event board →
6
GP
6.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#8/33Event board →
4
GP
8.8
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #82Alexandre KuimiPF · Cameroonrank_below · #84Mohamed MadarMorocco
//current_rank
#83
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#81
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
8.8
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #83
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
2.7
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.0
P58
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
4.5
P63
True shooting
35%
P43
Two-way impact
-11.6
P44
Stops
66%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
14 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
3 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
5 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 34●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
6.0 / game
14–46
FGM–FGA
3–12
3PM–3PA
5–12
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.5 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.19×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
7
OREB
20
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
7
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.7
HESI
43.6
PI
61.7
ORtg
73.3
DRtg
-11.6
NRtg
-9.5
Stable NRtg
66%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
2%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
+0.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.8
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.8
P77
Playmaking
2.0
P83
Rebounding
5.0
P73
True shooting
51%
P59
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
52%
16 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
35
PTS
8.8 / game
16–31
FGM–FGA
1–8
3PM–3PA
2–7
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.0 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.89×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
20
REB
5.0 / game
6
OREB
14
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53%
eFG%
6%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.