Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Gadiel Khayech

Combo Guard · TUN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

182 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.5 APGCreation · 29th event percentile

0.5 stocksDefensive activity · 28th event percentile

43.1
HESI v2.1: #81
of 138: 14%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #81 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

43.1

Event performance

43rd event percentile

46.0

Prospect index

42nd event percentile

ORtg

32.4

Points / 100 poss.

8th event percentile

DRtg

62.0

Lower is better

89th event percentile

NRtg

-29.6

Two-way margin

24th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 32.4 · 8th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 62.0 · Stop% 90.6% · Team DRtg 72.7

Sample context

2 games · 10 minutes · 14% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

0.5 APG29th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.5 stocks28th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

43.1

43rd event percentile

Prospect index

46.0

42nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

32.4

8th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

62.0

89th event percentile

Two-way margin

-29.6

24th event percentile

Stop percentage

90.6%

97th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.5 PPG

18th event percentile

Creation

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Rebounding

1.0 RPG

9th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.5 stocks

28th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

20.5% TS

16th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 43rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 32.4 ORtg and 62.0 DRtg, producing a -29.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, rebounding, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive stops
90.6% Stop%
97th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
62.0 DRtg
89th event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
32.4 ORtg
8th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
9th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Scoring efficiency
20.5% TS
16th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

32.4

8th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.5 PPG

18th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

20.5%

16th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

16.7%

15th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

16.7%

17th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Free throws

33.3%

18th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

17.5%

11th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

62.0

89th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+10.6

98th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

90.6%

97th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.5 STL+BLK

28th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

3.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-29.6

24th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-8.7

43rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

43.1

43rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

46.0

42nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.8%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.0 RPG

9th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

9.6

context

4.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

13.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#81

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

476.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

1.5

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

#81

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#81/138Event board →

1.5

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#24/34Event board →

5.7

PPG

1.0

RPG

3.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #80Mohamed KeitaRwanda

//current_rank

#81

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #82Alexandre KuimiPF · Cameroon

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#79
Kelvin Ganza Hirwa
Guard · Rwanda
1.0 PPG 2.0 RPG 0.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.5

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

0.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

21%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

2 GP · event rank #81

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.5

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

21%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.5

P18

Playmaking

0.5

P29

Rebounding

1.0

True shooting

21%

P16

Two-way impact

-29.6

P24

Stops

91%

P97

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

33% of attempts from three

●2PA 4●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.5 / game

1–6

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.5 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

0.25×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.0 / game

OREB

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.5 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

43.1

HESI

46.0

32.4

ORtg

62.0

DRtg

-29.6

NRtg

-8.7

Stable NRtg

91%

Stop%

18%

Floor%

17%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

72.7

Team DRtg

+10.6

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026

3 GP · event rank #24

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.7

PPG

1.0

RPG

3.0

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

35%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.7

P57

Playmaking

3.0

P84

Rebounding

1.0

True shooting

35%

P26

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

6 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

Free throws

50%

3 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

45% of attempts from three

●2PA 12●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.7 / game

6–22

FGM–FGA

2–10

3PM–3PA

3–6

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.0 / game

TOV

1.7 / game

1.80×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

1.0 / game

OREB

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

32%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.