Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Kelvin Ganza Hirwa

Combo Guard · RWA · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.0 RPGRebounding · 28th event percentile

1.0 PPGScoring load · 15th event percentile

41.6
HESI v2.1: #79
of 138: 8%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #79 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

41.6

Event performance

42nd event percentile

47.2

Prospect index

43rd event percentile

ORtg

27.0

Points / 100 poss.

5th event percentile

DRtg

78.0

Lower is better

50th event percentile

NRtg

-51.0

Two-way margin

8th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 27.0 · 5th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.0 · Stop% 83.3% · Team DRtg 88.4

Sample context

1 games · 5 minutes · 8% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

2.0 RPG28th event percentile

Scoring load

1.0 PPG15th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

41.6

42nd event percentile

Prospect index

47.2

43rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

27.0

5th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.0

50th event percentile

Two-way margin

-51.0

8th event percentile

Stop percentage

83.3%

93rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.0 PPG

15th event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

2.0 RPG

28th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks

15th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

15.1% TS

10th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 42nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 27.0 ORtg and 78.0 DRtg, producing a -51.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

Defensive stops
83.3% Stop%
93rd event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
27.0 ORtg
5th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Two-way margin
-51.0 NRtg
8th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

27.0

5th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.0 PPG

15th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

15.1%

10th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

0.0%

4th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

0.0%

4th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

2.0 attempts per game

Free throws

33.3%

18th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

18.0%

12th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.0

50th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+10.4

97th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

83.3%

93rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.0 STL+BLK

15th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

1.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-51.0

8th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-8.9

42nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

41.6

42nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

47.2

43rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-0.8%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.0 RPG

28th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

5.0

context

5.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

7.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#79

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

421.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

1.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

0.0

APG

#79

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#79/138Event board →

1.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #78David Elisée Alex Lendoye Engandzas Zouba OngueleSG · Gabon

//current_rank

#79

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #80Mohamed KeitaRwanda

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#77
Junior Djibrine
Center · Chad
12.8 PPG 7.2 RPG 2.5 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

0.0

APG

0.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

15%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

1 GP · event rank #79

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

0.0

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

15%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P15

Playmaking

0.0

Rebounding

2.0

P28

True shooting

15%

P10

Two-way impact

-51.0

Stops

83%

P93

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

0 made / 2 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

100% of attempts from three

●2PA 0●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.0 / game

0–2

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.0 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.0 / game

OREB

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

41.6

HESI

47.2

27.0

ORtg

78.0

DRtg

-51.0

NRtg

-8.9

Stable NRtg

83%

Stop%

18%

Floor%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

+10.4

Def. lift

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.