ORtg
74.1
47th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Junior Djibrine
Center · CHA · b. 2008
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer12.8 PPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder7.2 RPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.2 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 81st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
12.8 PPGScoring load · 91st event percentile
7.2 RPGRebounding · 87th event percentile
- 46.0
- HESI v2.1
- #77
- of 138
- 74%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #77 of 138 · Established
HESI
46.0
Event performance
46th event percentile
PI
48.3
Prospect index
45th event percentile
ORtg
74.1
Points / 100 poss.
47th event percentile
DRtg
82.1
Lower is better
39th event percentile
NRtg
-8.0
Two-way margin
47th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 74.1 · 47th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 82.1 · Stop% 66.7% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 174 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
12.8 PPG91st event percentile
Rebounding
7.2 RPG87th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
46.0
46th event percentile
Prospect index
48.3
45th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
74.1
47th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
82.1
39th event percentile
Two-way margin
-8.0
47th event percentile
Stop percentage
66.7%
70th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
12.8 PPG
91st event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
87th event percentile
Rebounding
7.2 RPG
87th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
79th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
40.0% TS
62nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P91
Scorer
12.8 PPG · 91st event percentile
- P87
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile
- P87
Rebounder
7.2 RPG · 87th event percentile
- P81
Activity
7.2 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 81st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 46th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.1 ORtg and 82.1 DRtg, producing a -8.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, rebounding, and creation. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 91st event percentile
Scoring load
12.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 87th event percentile
Rebounding
7.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 87th event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 39th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
82.1 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
12.8 PPG
91st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
40.0%
62nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
39.0%
66th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.9%
61st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.3%
context7.7 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
45th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
31.7%
40th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.5 APG
87th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
82.1
39th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.7
81st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
66.7%
70th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
79th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
47.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-8.0
47th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.3
46th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
46.0
46th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
48.3
45th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.1%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.2 RPG
87th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
174.3
context29.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#77
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
492.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
12.8
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.5
APG
#77
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#8
RANK
57
FIELD
88%
PERCENTILE
11.3
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#77/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.8
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.5
APG
3.5
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.8
P91
Playmaking
2.5
P87
Rebounding
7.2
P87
True shooting
40%
P62
Two-way impact
-8.0
P47
Stops
67%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
29 made / 91 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
13 made / 46 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
6 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
●2PA 45●3PA 46
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
77
PTS
12.8 / game
29–91
FGM–FGA
13–46
3PM–3PA
6–12
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.71×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
43
REB
7.2 / game
10
OREB
33
DREB
7.2
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
17
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
46.0
HESI
48.3
PI
74.1
ORtg
82.1
DRtg
-8.0
NRtg
-7.3
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
8%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+2.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#8/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.3
PPG
9.2
RPG
2.2
APG
3.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.3
P80
Playmaking
2.2
P81
Rebounding
9.2
P90
True shooting
44%
P67
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
34%
24 made / 70 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
8 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
12 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
43% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 30
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
68
PTS
11.3 / game
24–70
FGM–FGA
8–30
3PM–3PA
12–18
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
22
TOV
3.7 / game
0.59×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
55
REB
9.2 / game
17
OREB
38
DREB
9.2
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
8
BLK
1.3 / game
18
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
4%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#75
#76
#78
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
11.3
PPG
9.2
RPG
2.2
APG
0.7
SPG
1.3
BPG
—
3P%
44%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #77
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.8
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.5
APG
3.5
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.8
P91
Playmaking
2.5
P87
Rebounding
7.2
P87
True shooting
40%
P62
Two-way impact
-8.0
P47
Stops
67%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
29 made / 91 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
13 made / 46 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
6 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
●2PA 45●3PA 46
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
77
PTS
12.8 / game
29–91
FGM–FGA
13–46
3PM–3PA
6–12
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.71×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
43
REB
7.2 / game
10
OREB
33
DREB
7.2
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
17
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
46.0
HESI
48.3
PI
74.1
ORtg
82.1
DRtg
-8.0
NRtg
-7.3
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
8%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+2.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.3
PPG
9.2
RPG
2.2
APG
3.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.3
P80
Playmaking
2.2
P81
Rebounding
9.2
P90
True shooting
44%
P67
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
34%
24 made / 70 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
8 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
12 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
43% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 30
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
68
PTS
11.3 / game
24–70
FGM–FGA
8–30
3PM–3PA
12–18
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
22
TOV
3.7 / game
0.59×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
55
REB
9.2 / game
17
OREB
38
DREB
9.2
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
8
BLK
1.3 / game
18
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
4%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.