ORtg
77.3
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
David Elisée Alex Lendoye Engandzas Zouba Onguele
Shooting Guard · GAB · b. 2008
//measurables
182 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led profile
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.6 APGCreation · 71st event percentile
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 71st event percentile
- 45.3
- HESI v2.1
- #78
- of 138
- 46%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #78 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
45.3
Event performance
45th event percentile
PI
47.7
Prospect index
44th event percentile
ORtg
77.3
Points / 100 poss.
55th event percentile
DRtg
87.1
Lower is better
26th event percentile
NRtg
-9.8
Two-way margin
45th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 77.3 · 55th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 87.1 · Stop% 76.4% · Team DRtg 96.4
Sample context
5 games · 51 minutes · 46% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led profileevent-relative description
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
1.6 APG71st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks71st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
45.3
45th event percentile
Prospect index
47.7
44th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
77.3
55th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.1
26th event percentile
Two-way margin
-9.8
45th event percentile
Stop percentage
76.4%
87th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.6 PPG
32nd event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG
71st event percentile
Rebounding
2.4 RPG
30th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
71st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.0% TS
46th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 45th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.3 ORtg and 87.1 DRtg, producing a -9.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, creation, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 87th event percentile
Defensive stops
76.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 71st event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 71st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 26th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.1 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 30th event percentile
Rebounding
2.4 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 32nd event percentile
Scoring load
2.6 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.6 PPG
32nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.0%
46th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.7%
29th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.7%
38th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.6 attempts per game
Free throws
71.4%
79th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.1%
66th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.6 APG
71st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
87.1
26th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+9.2
97th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
76.4%
87th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
71st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
17.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-9.8
45th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.4
45th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
45.3
45th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
47.7
44th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.1%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.4 RPG
30th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
50.8
context10.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
45.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#78
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
441.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.6
PPG
2.4
RPG
1.6
APG
#78
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#78/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.6
PPG
2.4
RPG
1.6
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.6
P32
Playmaking
1.6
P71
Rebounding
2.4
P30
True shooting
36%
P46
Two-way impact
-9.8
P45
Stops
76%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
5 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
2.6 / game
4–15
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
5–7
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
6
TOV
1.2 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.4 / game
8
OREB
4
DREB
2.4
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45.3
HESI
47.7
PI
77.3
ORtg
87.1
DRtg
-9.8
NRtg
-7.4
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
3%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
+9.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#45/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
24%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.3
P32
Playmaking
0.5
P32
Rebounding
2.8
P39
True shooting
24%
P17
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
13%
2 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
56%
5 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
27% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
9
PTS
2.3 / game
2–15
FGM–FGA
0–4
3PM–3PA
5–9
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
7
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
13%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #77Junior DjibrineC · Chadrank_below · #79Kelvin Ganza HirwaG · Rwanda
//current_rank
#78
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#76
#77
Center · Chad
12.8 PPG 7.2 RPG 2.5 APG
//event_signalActivity7.2 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#79
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
2.6
PPG
2.4
RPG
1.6
APG
1.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
0%
3P%
36%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #78
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.6
PPG
2.4
RPG
1.6
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.6
P32
Playmaking
1.6
P71
Rebounding
2.4
P30
True shooting
36%
P46
Two-way impact
-9.8
P45
Stops
76%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
5 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
2.6 / game
4–15
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
5–7
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
6
TOV
1.2 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.4 / game
8
OREB
4
DREB
2.4
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45.3
HESI
47.7
PI
77.3
ORtg
87.1
DRtg
-9.8
NRtg
-7.4
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
3%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
+9.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
4 GP · event rank #45
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
24%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.3
P32
Playmaking
0.5
P32
Rebounding
2.8
P39
True shooting
24%
P17
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
13%
2 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
56%
5 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
27% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
9
PTS
2.3 / game
2–15
FGM–FGA
0–4
3PM–3PA
5–9
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
7
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
13%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.