Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Kehinde Olawale Asimolowo

NGR · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

4.3 RPGRebounding · 60th event percentile

1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 53rd event percentile

43.8
HESI v2.1: #76
of 138: 48%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #76 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

43.8

Event performance

44th event percentile

48.9

Prospect index

45th event percentile

ORtg

71.6

Points / 100 poss.

43rd event percentile

DRtg

83.0

Lower is better

36th event percentile

NRtg

-11.4

Two-way margin

45th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 71.6 · 43rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 83.0 · Stop% 58.6% · Team DRtg 81.6

Sample context

4 games · 55 minutes · 48% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

4.3 RPG60th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks53rd event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

43.8

44th event percentile

Prospect index

48.9

45th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

71.6

43rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

83.0

36th event percentile

Two-way margin

-11.4

45th event percentile

Stop percentage

58.6%

45th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.3 PPG

34th event percentile

Creation

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Rebounding

4.3 RPG

60th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

36.0% TS

46th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 44th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.6 ORtg and 83.0 DRtg, producing a -11.4 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring load
3.3 PPG
34th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Defensive efficiency
83.0 DRtg
36th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

71.6

43rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.3 PPG

34th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

36.0%

46th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

30.0%

38th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

26.7%

38th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

50.0%

context

0.5 attempts per game

Free throws

57.1%

59th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

34.6%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

83.0

36th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

81.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.4

50th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

58.6%

45th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

53rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

14.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-11.4

45th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-8.2

44th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

43.8

44th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

48.9

45th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.6%

40th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.3 RPG

60th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

55.4

context

13.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

48.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#76

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

435.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

0.5

APG

#76

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3

Regional · 2026

RANK

FIELD

75%

PERCENTILE

7.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#76/138Event board →

3.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

0.5

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3

Regional · 2026

#9/33Event board →

7.0

PPG

4.5

RPG

1.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #75Tsiriniaina Fandresena Yoann NdrianaC · Madagascar

//current_rank

#76

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #77Junior DjibrineC · Chad

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#74
Joshwa Alvin Muhirwa
Rwanda
7.0 PPG 8.2 RPG 0.2 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7.0

PPG

4.5

RPG

1.0

APG

1.3

SPG

0.5

BPG

—

3P%

54%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

4 GP · event rank #76

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

0.5

APG

1.5

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P34

Playmaking

0.5

P29

Rebounding

4.3

P60

True shooting

36%

P46

Two-way impact

-11.4

P45

Stops

59%

P45

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

4 made / 15 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

57%

4 made / 7 attempts

Shot selection

13% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.3 / game

4–15

FGM–FGA

1–2

3PM–3PA

4–7

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.5 / game

TOV

1.5 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.3 / game

OREB

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

STL

0.5 / game

BLK

0.5 / game

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

43.8

HESI

48.9

71.6

ORtg

83.0

DRtg

-11.4

NRtg

-8.2

Stable NRtg

59%

Stop%

35%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

PIE

81.6

Team DRtg

-1.4

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026

4 GP · event rank #9

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.0

PPG

4.5

RPG

1.0

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

54%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.0

P62

Playmaking

1.0

P61

Rebounding

4.5

P56

True shooting

54%

P86

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

44%

8 made / 18 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

61%

11 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

11% of attempts from three

●2PA 16●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.0 / game

8–18

FGM–FGA

1–2

3PM–3PA

11–18

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

0.57×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

4.5 / game

OREB

DREB

4.5

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.5 / game

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

47%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.