ORtg
65.0
37th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Tsiriniaina Fandresena Yoann Ndriana
Center · MAD · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
195 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
6.0 RPGRebounding · 80th event percentile
1.8 stocksDefensive activity · 66th event percentile
- 47.5
- HESI v2.1
- #75
- of 138
- 70%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #75 of 138 · Established
HESI
47.5
Event performance
47th event percentile
PI
49.5
Prospect index
46th event percentile
ORtg
65.0
Points / 100 poss.
37th event percentile
DRtg
72.0
Lower is better
65th event percentile
NRtg
-7.0
Two-way margin
47th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 65.0 · 37th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 72.0 · Stop% 68.8% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
6 games · 142 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.0 RPG80th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks66th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
47.5
47th event percentile
Prospect index
49.5
46th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
65.0
37th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
72.0
65th event percentile
Two-way margin
-7.0
47th event percentile
Stop percentage
68.8%
74th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.7 PPG
46th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
12th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
80th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.6% TS
61st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 47th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 65.0 ORtg and 72.0 DRtg, producing a -7.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are creation and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 74th event percentile
Defensive stops
68.8% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 66th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 12th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 37th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
65.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.7 PPG
46th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.6%
61st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.0%
62nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.0%
74th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.7 attempts per game
Free throws
42.1%
31st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.6%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
12th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
72.0
65th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.5
71st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.8%
74th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
38.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-7.0
47th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-6.5
47th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
47.5
47th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
49.5
46th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.3%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.0 RPG
80th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
141.8
context23.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#75
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.7
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.2
APG
#75
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#4
RANK
33
FIELD
91%
PERCENTILE
11.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#75/138Event board →
6
GP
4.7
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.2
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#4/33Event board →
4
GP
11.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #74Joshwa Alvin MuhirwaRwandarank_below · #76Kehinde Olawale AsimolowoNigeria
//current_rank
#75
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#73
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
11.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
1.3
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
69%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #75
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.7
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.7
P46
Playmaking
0.2
P12
Rebounding
6.0
P80
True shooting
40%
P61
Two-way impact
-7.0
P47
Stops
69%
P74
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
10 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
15% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
28
PTS
4.7 / game
10–27
FGM–FGA
0–4
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.07×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
36
REB
6.0 / game
17
OREB
19
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
23
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
47.5
HESI
49.5
PI
65.0
ORtg
72.0
DRtg
-7.0
NRtg
-6.5
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
0%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
69%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P85
Playmaking
0.8
P50
Rebounding
4.5
P65
True shooting
69%
P95
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
68%
21 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
6% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
44
PTS
11.0 / game
21–31
FGM–FGA
1–2
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
2
TOV
0.5 / game
1.50×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
18
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
9
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
4
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
69%
eFG%
8%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.