ORtg
80.3
62nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
RWA · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
205 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
8.2 RPGRebounding · 94th event percentile
7.0 PPGScoring load · 70th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #74 of 138 · Established
HESI
44.5
Event performance
45th event percentile
PI
49.5
Prospect index
47th event percentile
ORtg
80.3
Points / 100 poss.
62nd event percentile
DRtg
89.4
Lower is better
18th event percentile
NRtg
-9.2
Two-way margin
46th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 80.3 · 62nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.4 · Stop% 57.2% · Team DRtg 88.4
Sample context
5 games · 163 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
44.5
45th event percentile
Prospect index
49.5
47th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
80.3
62nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.4
18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-9.2
46th event percentile
Stop percentage
57.2%
42nd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
70th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
14th event percentile
Rebounding
8.2 RPG
94th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.4 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
40.1% TS
63rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rim Protection
3.0 BPG · 99th event percentile
Rebounder
8.2 RPG · 94th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 45th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 80.3 ORtg and 89.4 DRtg, producing a -9.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive efficiency.
Rebounding
8.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Defensive efficiency
89.4 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
80.3
62nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
7.0 PPG
70th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
40.1%
63rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.8%
52nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.4%
62nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
8.3%
context2.4 attempts per game
Free throws
54.5%
54th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
41.2%
77th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
14th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.4
18th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.1
53rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.2%
42nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.4 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
39.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-9.2
46th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-8.1
45th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
44.5
45th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
49.5
47th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.4%
80th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.2 RPG
94th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
162.8
context32.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#74
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
421.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
7.0
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.2
APG
#74
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#26
RANK
70
FIELD
64%
PERCENTILE
6.3
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
7.0
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.2
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
3
GP
5.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
4
GP
6.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#74
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.3
APG
1.3
SPG
1.3
BPG
—
3P%
48%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #74
//quick_read
7.0
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.2
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.0
P70
Playmaking
0.2
P14
Rebounding
8.2
P94
True shooting
40%
P63
Two-way impact
-9.2
P46
Stops
57%
P42
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
32%
11 made / 34 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
8%
1 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
55%
12 made / 22 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
35
PTS
7.0 / game
11–34
FGM–FGA
1–12
3PM–3PA
12–22
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
8
TOV
1.6 / game
0.13×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
41
REB
8.2 / game
12
OREB
29
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.4 / game
15
BLK
3.0 / game
6
PF
17
STL+BLK
3.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
44.5
HESI
49.5
PI
80.3
ORtg
89.4
DRtg
-9.2
NRtg
-8.1
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
8%
PIE
88.4
Team DRtg
-1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #26
//quick_read
6.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.3
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.3
P51
Playmaking
0.3
P20
Rebounding
4.3
P61
True shooting
48%
P71
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
45%
9 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
7 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
15% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
6.3 / game
9–20
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
7–14
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
0.20×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
4.3 / game
7
OREB
10
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
5
BLK
1.3 / game
6
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
45%
eFG%
2%
PIE
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
3 GP · event rank #52
//quick_read
5.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.0
P55
Playmaking
1.3
P63
Rebounding
3.0
P40
True shooting
33%
P43
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
6 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
1 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
15
PTS
5.0 / game
6–21
FGM–FGA
1–7
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.3 / game
2
TOV
0.7 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
9
REB
3.0 / game
3
OREB
6
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.7 / game
9
BLK
3.0 / game
10
PF
14
STL+BLK
4.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
31%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.