back_to_rankings
Joshwa Alvin Muhirwa portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Joshwa Alvin Muhirwa

RWA · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

205 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

8.2 RPGRebounding · 94th event percentile

7.0 PPGScoring load · 70th event percentile

44.5
HESI v2.1
#74
of 138
73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

3 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #74 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

44.5

Event performance

45th event percentile

PI

49.5

Prospect index

47th event percentile

ORtg

80.3

Points / 100 poss.

62nd event percentile

DRtg

89.4

Lower is better

18th event percentile

NRtg

-9.2

Two-way margin

46th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 80.3 · 62nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 89.4 · Stop% 57.2% · Team DRtg 88.4

Sample context

5 games · 163 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

8.2 RPG94th event percentile

Scoring load

7.0 PPG70th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

44.5

45th event percentile

Prospect index

49.5

47th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

80.3

62nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

89.4

18th event percentile

Two-way margin

-9.2

46th event percentile

Stop percentage

57.2%

42nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.0 PPG

70th event percentile

Creation

0.2 APG

14th event percentile

Rebounding

8.2 RPG

94th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.4 stocks

62nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

40.1% TS

63rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P99

    Rim Protection

    3.0 BPG · 99th event percentile

  • P94

    Rebounder

    8.2 RPG · 94th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 45th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 80.3 ORtg and 89.4 DRtg, producing a -9.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Rebounding

    8.2 RPG

    94th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  2. Scoring load

    7.0 PPG

    70th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.2 APG

    14th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    89.4 DRtg

    18th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

80.3

62nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.0 PPG

70th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

40.1%

63rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

33.8%

52nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

32.4%

62nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

8.3%

context

2.4 attempts per game

Free throws

54.5%

54th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

41.2%

77th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.2 APG

14th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

89.4

18th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.1

53rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

57.2%

42nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.4 STL+BLK

62nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

39.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-9.2

46th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-8.1

45th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

44.5

45th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

49.5

47th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.4%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

8.2 RPG

94th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

162.8

context

32.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#74

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

421.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

7.0

PPG

8.2

RPG

0.2

APG

#74

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#26

RANK

70

FIELD

64%

PERCENTILE

6.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

7.0

PPG

8.2

RPG

0.2

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

3

GP

5.0

PPG

3.0

RPG

1.3

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

4

GP

6.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

0.3

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Tsiory Ulrick Rakotozafy portrait#72

    Tsiory Ulrick Rakotozafy

    Shooting Guard · Madagascar

    6.5 PPG 1.7 RPG 1.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

6.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

0.3

APG

1.3

SPG

1.3

BPG

—

3P%

48%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #74

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.0

PPG

8.2

RPG

0.2

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

40%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.0

P70

Playmaking

0.2

P14

Rebounding

8.2

P94

True shooting

40%

P63

Two-way impact

-9.2

P46

Stops

57%

P42

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

32%

11 made / 34 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

8%

1 made / 12 attempts

FT

Free throws

55%

12 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

35% of attempts from three

●2PA 22●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

35

PTS

7.0 / game

11–34

FGM–FGA

1–12

3PM–3PA

12–22

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.2 / game

8

TOV

1.6 / game

0.13×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

41

REB

8.2 / game

12

OREB

29

DREB

8.2

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

15

BLK

3.0 / game

6

PF

17

STL+BLK

3.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

44.5

HESI

49.5

PI

80.3

ORtg

89.4

DRtg

-9.2

NRtg

-8.1

Stable NRtg

57%

Stop%

41%

Floor%

34%

eFG%

8%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

-1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games163 minutes32.6 min/game73% sample weightrank #74 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #26

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

4.3

RPG

0.3

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

48%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P51

Playmaking

0.3

P20

Rebounding

4.3

P61

True shooting

48%

P71

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

45%

9 made / 20 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

7 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

15% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

25

PTS

6.3 / game

9–20

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

7–14

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.3 / game

5

TOV

1.3 / game

0.20×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

17

REB

4.3 / game

7

OREB

10

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

5

STL

1.3 / game

5

BLK

1.3 / game

6

PF

10

STL+BLK

2.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

45%

eFG%

2%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #26 of 70

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

3 GP · event rank #52

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.0

PPG

3.0

RPG

1.3

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

33%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.0

P55

Playmaking

1.3

P63

Rebounding

3.0

P40

True shooting

33%

P43

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

29%

6 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

2 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

33% of attempts from three

●2PA 14●3PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

15

PTS

5.0 / game

6–21

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

2–4

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

1.3 / game

2

TOV

0.7 / game

2.00×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

9

REB

3.0 / game

3

OREB

6

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

5

STL

1.7 / game

9

BLK

3.0 / game

10

PF

14

STL+BLK

4.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

31%

eFG%

0%

PIE

sample_context

3 gamesrank #52 of 131

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.