ORtg
71.7
44th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Shooting Guard · MAD · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
189 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
6.5 PPGScoring load · 65th event percentile
1.3 APGCreation · 63rd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #72 of 138 · Established
HESI
48.2
Event performance
48th event percentile
PI
51.2
Prospect index
48th event percentile
ORtg
71.7
Points / 100 poss.
44th event percentile
DRtg
78.3
Lower is better
48th event percentile
NRtg
-6.5
Two-way margin
48th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 71.7 · 44th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 78.3 · Stop% 54.1% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
6 games · 121 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Creation
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
48.2
48th event percentile
Prospect index
51.2
48th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
71.7
44th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
78.3
48th event percentile
Two-way margin
-6.5
48th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.1%
31st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
6.5 PPG
65th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
63rd event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
44th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.0% TS
34th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 48th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.7 ORtg and 78.3 DRtg, producing a -6.5 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive stops, and scoring efficiency.
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive stops
54.1% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Scoring efficiency
33.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
71.7
44th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
6.5 PPG
65th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.0%
34th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
32.1%
44th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.0%
32nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
19.0%
context7.0 attempts per game
Free throws
42.9%
32nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.8%
33rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
63rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
78.3
48th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.8
29th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.1%
31st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
44th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
25.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-6.5
48th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-6.1
48th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
48.2
48th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
51.2
48th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.2%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
121.1
context20.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#72
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.5
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.3
APG
#72
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#6
RANK
33
FIELD
84%
PERCENTILE
11.8
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.5
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
4
GP
11.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.8
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#72
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
11.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.8
APG
1.0
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
62%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #72
//quick_read
6.5
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.3
APG
1.5
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.5
P65
Playmaking
1.3
P63
Rebounding
1.7
P23
True shooting
33%
P34
Two-way impact
-6.5
P48
Stops
54%
P31
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
25%
14 made / 56 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
8 made / 42 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
3 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
75% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
39
PTS
6.5 / game
14–56
FGM–FGA
8–42
3PM–3PA
3–7
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.3 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.89×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
3
OREB
7
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
48.2
HESI
51.2
PI
71.7
ORtg
78.3
DRtg
-6.5
NRtg
-6.1
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
-4.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #6
//quick_read
11.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.8
APG
2.0
TOV/G
2.5
3PM/G
62%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.8
P91
Playmaking
1.8
P79
Rebounding
3.3
P50
True shooting
62%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
49%
18 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
10 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
76% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
47
PTS
11.8 / game
18–37
FGM–FGA
10–28
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
0.88×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
3
OREB
10
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.0 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
3
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
62%
eFG%
7%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.