back_to_rankings
Sofiane Ben Bougrine Ben Rezouk portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Sofiane Ben Bougrine Ben Rezouk

MAR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

2 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

2
film items
0
scout badges
On file
scout report

01

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Gabon U18 · 2026-09-16 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

  • Clipvs vs Gabon U18 · 2026-09-16 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip

02

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-16

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

combo_guard · off_guard · on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option

combo_guard · off_guard · on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Primary initiation, Ball-screen creation, Secondary creation.

Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo GuardProjects · Off Guard

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

  • · Primary initiation
  • · Ball-screen creation
  • · Secondary creation

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a on-ball creator. Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option.

Defensive assignments

primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Primary initiation · Ball-screen creation

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

2 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

JUCO

JUCO hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

48.9 performance rating · rank 70 · 5 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 76.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

37.0% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

60.6% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.

03

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #70 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

48.9

Event performance

49th event percentile

PI

51.8

Prospect index

50th event percentile

ORtg

76.2

Points / 100 poss.

51st event percentile

DRtg

82.5

Lower is better

37th event percentile

NRtg

-6.3

Two-way margin

49th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 76.2 · 51st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 82.5 · Stop% 60.6% · Team DRtg 83.1

Sample context

5 games · 160 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

3.8 APG94th event percentile

Scoring load

9.8 PPG83rd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

48.9

49th event percentile

Prospect index

51.8

50th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

76.2

51st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

82.5

37th event percentile

Two-way margin

-6.3

49th event percentile

Stop percentage

60.6%

49th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

9.8 PPG

83rd event percentile

Creation

3.8 APG

94th event percentile

Rebounding

5.8 RPG

78th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.4 stocks

74th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

36.1% TS

47th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P94

    Creator

    3.8 APG · 94th event percentile

  • P75

    Activity

    5.8 RPG + 2.4 defensive plays/G · 75th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 49th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.2 ORtg and 82.5 DRtg, producing a -6.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    3.8 APG

    94th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Scoring load

    9.8 PPG

    83rd event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Rebounding

    5.8 RPG

    78th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    82.5 DRtg

    37th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

76.2

51st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

9.8 PPG

83rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

36.1%

47th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

29.7%

36th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

28.8%

47th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

4.8%

context

4.2 attempts per game

Free throws

70.0%

77th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

37.0%

61st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.8 APG

94th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

82.5

37th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

83.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.6

64th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

60.6%

49th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.4 STL+BLK

74th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

40.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-6.3

49th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-6.1

49th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

48.9

49th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

51.8

50th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.7%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.8 RPG

78th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

160.4

context

32.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

72.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#70

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

412.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

04

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

9.8

PPG

5.8

RPG

3.8

APG

#70

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#8

RANK

131

FIELD

95%

PERCENTILE

12.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

9.8

PPG

5.8

RPG

3.8

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

4

GP

12.0

PPG

4.0

RPG

6.8

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Omar Mostafa portrait#68

    Omar Mostafa

    Point Guard · Egypt

    2.5 PPG 1.5 RPG 2.0 APG

05

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

12.0

PPG

4.0

RPG

6.8

APG

3.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

24%

3P%

46%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #70

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.8

PPG

5.8

RPG

3.8

APG

3.4

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.8

P83

Playmaking

3.8

P94

Rebounding

5.8

P78

True shooting

36%

P47

Two-way impact

-6.3

P49

Stops

61%

P49

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

29%

17 made / 59 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

5%

1 made / 21 attempts

FT

Free throws

70%

14 made / 20 attempts

Shot selection

36% of attempts from three

●2PA 38●3PA 21

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

49

PTS

9.8 / game

17–59

FGM–FGA

1–21

3PM–3PA

14–20

FTM–FTA

creation

19

AST

3.8 / game

17

TOV

3.4 / game

1.12×

AST:TOV

21

FD

rebounding

29

REB

5.8 / game

7

OREB

22

DREB

5.8

REB/G

defense

11

STL

2.2 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

11

PF

12

STL+BLK

2.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

48.9

HESI

51.8

PI

76.2

ORtg

82.5

DRtg

-6.3

NRtg

-6.1

Stable NRtg

61%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

7%

PIE

83.1

Team DRtg

+0.6

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games160 minutes32.1 min/game73% sample weightrank #70 of 138

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

4 GP · event rank #8

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.0

PPG

4.0

RPG

6.8

APG

3.3

TOV/G

1.5

3PM/G

46%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.0

P91

Playmaking

6.8

P100

Rebounding

4.0

P53

True shooting

46%

P88

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

18 made / 48 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

24%

6 made / 25 attempts

FT

Free throws

67%

6 made / 9 attempts

Shot selection

52% of attempts from three

●2PA 23●3PA 25

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

48

PTS

12.0 / game

18–48

FGM–FGA

6–25

3PM–3PA

6–9

FTM–FTA

creation

27

AST

6.8 / game

13

TOV

3.3 / game

2.08×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

16

REB

4.0 / game

4

OREB

12

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

12

STL

3.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

12

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

44%

eFG%

2%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #8 of 131

06

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.