ORtg
76.2
51st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile2 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Gabon U18 · 2026-09-16 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-16
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
combo_guard · off_guard · on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option
combo_guard · off_guard · on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Primary initiation, Ball-screen creation, Secondary creation.
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a on-ball creator. Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Primary initiation · Ball-screen creation
evidence_strength
strong
2 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
JUCO
JUCO hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive48.9 performance rating · rank 70 · 5 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 76.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive37.0% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive60.6% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #70 of 138 · Established
HESI
48.9
Event performance
49th event percentile
PI
51.8
Prospect index
50th event percentile
ORtg
76.2
Points / 100 poss.
51st event percentile
DRtg
82.5
Lower is better
37th event percentile
NRtg
-6.3
Two-way margin
49th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 76.2 · 51st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 82.5 · Stop% 60.6% · Team DRtg 83.1
Sample context
5 games · 160 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring load
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
48.9
49th event percentile
Prospect index
51.8
50th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.2
51st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
82.5
37th event percentile
Two-way margin
-6.3
49th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.6%
49th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
9.8 PPG
83rd event percentile
Creation
3.8 APG
94th event percentile
Rebounding
5.8 RPG
78th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.4 stocks
74th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.1% TS
47th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
3.8 APG · 94th event percentile
Activity
5.8 RPG + 2.4 defensive plays/G · 75th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 49th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.2 ORtg and 82.5 DRtg, producing a -6.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Creation
3.8 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
9.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
5.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive efficiency
82.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
76.2
51st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
9.8 PPG
83rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.1%
47th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
29.7%
36th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
28.8%
47th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
4.8%
context4.2 attempts per game
Free throws
70.0%
77th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.0%
61st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.8 APG
94th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
82.5
37th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
83.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.6
64th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.6%
49th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.4 STL+BLK
74th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
40.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-6.3
49th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-6.1
49th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
48.9
49th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
51.8
50th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.7%
74th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.8 RPG
78th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
160.4
context32.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#70
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
412.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
9.8
PPG
5.8
RPG
3.8
APG
#70
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#8
RANK
131
FIELD
95%
PERCENTILE
12.0
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
9.8
PPG
5.8
RPG
3.8
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
4
GP
12.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
6.8
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#70
of 138 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
12.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
6.8
APG
3.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
24%
3P%
46%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #70
//quick_read
9.8
PPG
5.8
RPG
3.8
APG
3.4
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.8
P83
Playmaking
3.8
P94
Rebounding
5.8
P78
True shooting
36%
P47
Two-way impact
-6.3
P49
Stops
61%
P49
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
17 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
5%
1 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
14 made / 20 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
49
PTS
9.8 / game
17–59
FGM–FGA
1–21
3PM–3PA
14–20
FTM–FTA
creation
19
AST
3.8 / game
17
TOV
3.4 / game
1.12×
AST:TOV
21
FD
rebounding
29
REB
5.8 / game
7
OREB
22
DREB
5.8
REB/G
defense
11
STL
2.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
11
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
48.9
HESI
51.8
PI
76.2
ORtg
82.5
DRtg
-6.3
NRtg
-6.1
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
7%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
+0.6
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
4 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
12.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
6.8
APG
3.3
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.0
P91
Playmaking
6.8
P100
Rebounding
4.0
P53
True shooting
46%
P88
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
38%
18 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
24%
6 made / 25 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
6 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
48
PTS
12.0 / game
18–48
FGM–FGA
6–25
3PM–3PA
6–9
FTM–FTA
creation
27
AST
6.8 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
2.08×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
4
OREB
12
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
12
STL
3.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
12
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
44%
eFG%
2%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.