back_to_rankings
Omar Mostafa portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Omar Mostafa

Point Guard · EGY · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.0 APGCreation · 80th event percentile

1.3 stocksDefensive activity · 60th event percentile

49.6
HESI v2.1
#68
of 138
50%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #68 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

49.6

Event performance

50th event percentile

PI

52.4

Prospect index

51st event percentile

ORtg

82.0

Points / 100 poss.

67th event percentile

DRtg

87.7

Lower is better

26th event percentile

NRtg

-5.7

Two-way margin

50th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 82.0 · 67th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 87.7 · Stop% 54.9% · Team DRtg 85.6

Sample context

4 games · 60 minutes · 50% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.0 APG80th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks60th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

49.6

50th event percentile

Prospect index

52.4

51st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

82.0

67th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

87.7

26th event percentile

Two-way margin

-5.7

50th event percentile

Stop percentage

54.9%

35th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.5 PPG

31st event percentile

Creation

2.0 APG

80th event percentile

Rebounding

1.5 RPG

20th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

60th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

38.5% TS

57th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 50th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.0 ORtg and 87.7 DRtg, producing a -5.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    2.0 APG

    80th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Offensive efficiency

    82.0 ORtg

    67th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Rebounding

    1.5 RPG

    20th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    87.7 DRtg

    26th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  3. Scoring load

    2.5 PPG

    31st event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

82.0

67th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.5 PPG

31st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

38.5%

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

38.5%

65th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

30.8%

54th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

20.0%

context

2.5 attempts per game

Floor%

33.9%

49th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.0 APG

80th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

87.7

26th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.1

46th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.9%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

60th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

13.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-5.7

50th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-5.5

50th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

49.6

50th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

52.4

51st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.2%

49th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.5 RPG

20th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

4

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

60.0

context

15.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

50.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#68

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

497.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

4

GP

2.5

PPG

1.5

RPG

2.0

APG

#68

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

4

GP

2.5

PPG

1.5

RPG

2.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

4

GP

1.5

PPG

1.3

RPG

2.5

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Youssef Kallel portrait#66

    Youssef Kallel

    Tunisia

    3.5 PPG 4.3 RPG 0.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

2.5

PPG

1.5

RPG

2.0

APG

1.0

SPG

0.3

BPG

20%

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

4 GP · event rank #68

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.5

PPG

1.5

RPG

2.0

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.5

P31

Playmaking

2.0

P80

Rebounding

1.5

P20

True shooting

39%

P57

Two-way impact

-5.7

P50

Stops

55%

P35

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

77% of attempts from three

●2PA 3●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

10

PTS

2.5 / game

4–13

FGM–FGA

2–10

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

8

AST

2.0 / game

4

TOV

1.0 / game

2.00×

AST:TOV

0

FD

rebounding

6

REB

1.5 / game

1

OREB

5

DREB

1.5

REB/G

defense

4

STL

1.0 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

3

PF

5

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

49.6

HESI

52.4

PI

82.0

ORtg

87.7

DRtg

-5.7

NRtg

-5.5

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

34%

Floor%

39%

eFG%

2%

PIE

85.6

Team DRtg

-2.1

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games60 minutes15.0 min/game50% sample weightrank #68 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #43

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.5

PPG

1.3

RPG

2.5

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.5

P25

Playmaking

2.5

P78

Rebounding

1.3

P16

True shooting

27%

P26

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

18%

2 made / 11 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

2 made / 11 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

100% of attempts from three

●2PA 0●3PA 11

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

6

PTS

1.5 / game

2–11

FGM–FGA

2–11

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

2.5 / game

4

TOV

1.0 / game

2.50×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

5

REB

1.3 / game

1

OREB

4

DREB

1.3

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

27%

eFG%

1%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #43 of 70

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.