ORtg
82.0
67th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · EGY · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 APGCreation · 80th event percentile
1.3 stocksDefensive activity · 60th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #68 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
49.6
Event performance
50th event percentile
PI
52.4
Prospect index
51st event percentile
ORtg
82.0
Points / 100 poss.
67th event percentile
DRtg
87.7
Lower is better
26th event percentile
NRtg
-5.7
Two-way margin
50th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 82.0 · 67th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 87.7 · Stop% 54.9% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
4 games · 60 minutes · 50% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
49.6
50th event percentile
Prospect index
52.4
51st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
82.0
67th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.7
26th event percentile
Two-way margin
-5.7
50th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.9%
35th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
2.5 PPG
31st event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
1.5 RPG
20th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
60th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.5% TS
57th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 50th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.0 ORtg and 87.7 DRtg, producing a -5.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Offensive efficiency
82.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Rebounding
1.5 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive efficiency
87.7 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Scoring load
2.5 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
82.0
67th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
2.5 PPG
31st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.5%
57th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
38.5%
65th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.8%
54th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context2.5 attempts per game
Floor%
33.9%
49th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
87.7
26th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.1
46th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.9%
35th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
60th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
13.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-5.7
50th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-5.5
50th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
49.6
50th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
52.4
51st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.2%
49th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.5 RPG
20th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
60.0
context15.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
50.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#68
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
2.0
APG
#68
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
2.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
4
GP
1.5
PPG
1.3
RPG
2.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#68
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
2.0
APG
1.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
20%
3P%
39%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #68
//quick_read
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
2.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.5
P31
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
1.5
P20
True shooting
39%
P57
Two-way impact
-5.7
P50
Stops
55%
P35
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
31%
4 made / 13 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
77% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
10
PTS
2.5 / game
4–13
FGM–FGA
2–10
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.0 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.5 / game
1
OREB
5
DREB
1.5
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
3
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
49.6
HESI
52.4
PI
82.0
ORtg
87.7
DRtg
-5.7
NRtg
-5.5
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
2%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #43
//quick_read
1.5
PPG
1.3
RPG
2.5
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.5
P25
Playmaking
2.5
P78
Rebounding
1.3
P16
True shooting
27%
P26
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
18%
2 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
2 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
100% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
6
PTS
1.5 / game
2–11
FGM–FGA
2–11
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.5 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.3 / game
1
OREB
4
DREB
1.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
27%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.