ORtg
68.2
39th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Youssef Kallel
TUN · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
210 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
52.6% TSScoring efficiency · 88th event percentile
4.3 RPGRebounding · 61st event percentile
- 52.5
- HESI v2.1
- #66
- of 138
- 59%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #66 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
52.5
Event performance
53rd event percentile
PI
54.7
Prospect index
53rd event percentile
ORtg
68.2
Points / 100 poss.
39th event percentile
DRtg
70.3
Lower is better
72nd event percentile
NRtg
-2.2
Two-way margin
54th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 68.2 · 39th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 70.3 · Stop% 70.6% · Team DRtg 72.7
Sample context
6 games · 85 minutes · 59% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
52.6% TS88th event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG61st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
52.5
53rd event percentile
Prospect index
54.7
53rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
68.2
39th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
70.3
72nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-2.2
54th event percentile
Stop percentage
70.6%
79th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.5 PPG
38th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
22nd event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
61st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
50th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.6% TS
88th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 53rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 68.2 ORtg and 70.3 DRtg, producing a -2.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 88th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 79th event percentile
Defensive stops
70.6% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 72nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
70.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 22nd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 38th event percentile
Scoring load
3.5 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 39th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
68.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.5 PPG
38th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.6%
88th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
93rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
55.6%
56th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.5%
51st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
22nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
70.3
72nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.3
77th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.6%
79th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
50th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-2.2
54th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-3.5
53rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
52.5
53rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
54.7
53rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.9%
40th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
61st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
85.2
context14.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
58.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#66
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
476.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
3.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.3
APG
#66
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#4
RANK
34
FIELD
91%
PERCENTILE
6.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#66/138Event board →
6
GP
3.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.3
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#21/131Event board →
5
GP
5.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#4/34Event board →
4
GP
6.0
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #65Bayero AliyouCameroonrank_below · #67Plamedie BIZIMANA KAYIRASF · Rwanda
//current_rank
#66
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#64
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.0
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.3
APG
0.5
SPG
2.0
BPG
—
3P%
60%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #66
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.5
P38
Playmaking
0.3
P22
Rebounding
4.3
P61
True shooting
53%
P88
Two-way impact
-2.2
P54
Stops
71%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
8 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
56%
5 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.5 / game
8–16
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–9
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.14×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
26
REB
4.3 / game
12
OREB
14
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
15
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
52.5
HESI
54.7
PI
68.2
ORtg
70.3
DRtg
-2.2
NRtg
-3.5
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
2%
PIE
72.7
Team DRtg
+2.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.0
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.3
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.0
P65
Playmaking
0.3
P19
Rebounding
6.8
P91
True shooting
60%
P96
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
63%
10 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
6.0 / game
10–16
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.14×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
27
REB
6.8 / game
11
OREB
16
DREB
6.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
8
BLK
2.0 / game
7
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
63%
eFG%
7%
PIE
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
5 GP · event rank #21
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.0
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P60
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
8.8
P87
True shooting
38%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
10 made / 30 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
9 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
7% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
29
PTS
5.8 / game
10–30
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
9–18
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.42×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
44
REB
8.8 / game
13
OREB
31
DREB
8.8
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.6 / game
9
BLK
1.8 / game
14
PF
22
STL+BLK
4.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.