Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Bayero Aliyou

CMR · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

206 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

6.2 RPGRebounding · 82nd event percentile

2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 70th event percentile

51.8
HESI v2.1: #65
of 138: 64%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

1 public video

Available for visual validation

Scouting

Final report on file

Human evaluation is clearly labeled

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #65 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

51.8

Event performance

52nd event percentile

55.4

Prospect index

53rd event percentile

ORtg

57.2

Points / 100 poss.

24th event percentile

DRtg

59.7

Lower is better

95th event percentile

NRtg

-2.5

Two-way margin

53rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 57.2 · 24th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 59.7 · Stop% 83.5% · Team DRtg 65.9

Sample context

6 games · 106 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

6.2 RPG82nd event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks70th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

51.8

52nd event percentile

Prospect index

55.4

53rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

57.2

24th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

59.7

95th event percentile

Two-way margin

-2.5

53rd event percentile

Stop percentage

83.5%

94th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.7 PPG

33rd event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

44th event percentile

Rebounding

6.2 RPG

82nd event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks

70th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

27.7% TS

22nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P95
Defensive Impact
59.7 DRtg · 84% Stop% · 95th event percentile
P92
Rim Protection
1.2 BPG · 92nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 52nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 57.2 ORtg and 59.7 DRtg, producing a -2.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
59.7 DRtg
95th event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
83.5% Stop%
94th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Rebounding
6.2 RPG
82nd event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
27.7% TS
22nd event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
57.2 ORtg
24th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Scoring load
2.7 PPG
33rd event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

57.2

24th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.7 PPG

33rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

27.7%

22nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

21.4%

21st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

19.0%

18th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

16.7%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Free throws

38.9%

26th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

29.2%

29th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

44th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

59.7

95th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

65.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+6.2

92nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

83.5%

94th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.0 STL+BLK

70th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

36.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-2.5

53rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-3.5

52nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

51.8

52nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

55.4

53rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.4%

46th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.2 RPG

82nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

106.2

context

17.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

63.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#65

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

493.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Senegal U18 · 2026-09-23 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-23

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker

forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. Best current separators: Switching, Post defense, Rim protection. Primary pressure points: Gap help, Finishing, Advantage extension.

Now · ForwardProjects · Forward

Translatable strengths

· Switching
· Post defense
· Rim protection

Exploitable weaknesses

· Gap help
· Finishing
· Advantage extension

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.

Defensive assignments

primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Possible fit: Can contribute in selective switching and matchup-change coverages. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.

Limiting environments

Automatic switching across every matchup without size protection. Extended space assignments that consistently pull her away from the paint.

Development priorities

Gap help · Finishing

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

Limited representative evidence attached

pathway_hypothesis

NCAA D2

NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

51.8 performance rating · rank 65 · 6 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 57.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

29.2% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

83.5% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Limited representative evidence attached

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2.7

PPG

6.2

RPG

0.8

APG

#65

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#35

RANK

131

FIELD

74%

PERCENTILE

4.2

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#65/138Event board →

2.7

PPG

6.2

RPG

0.8

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#35/131Event board →

4.2

PPG

10.5

RPG

1.2

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #64Begad Mostafa Mohamed Eissa IbrahimEgypt

//current_rank

#65

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #66Youssef KallelTunisia

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#63
Adem Rafrafi
Tunisia
12.0 PPG 5.7 RPG 5.7 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.2

PPG

10.5

RPG

1.2

APG

0.3

SPG

4.7

BPG

3P%

22%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #65

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.7

PPG

6.2

RPG

0.8

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

28%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.7

P33

Playmaking

0.8

P44

Rebounding

6.2

P82

True shooting

28%

P22

Two-way impact

-2.5

P53

Stops

84%

P94

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

19%

4 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

Free throws

39%

7 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.7 / game

4–21

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

7–18

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.8 / game

TOV

1.7 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

6.2 / game

OREB

DREB

6.2

REB/G

defense

STL

0.8 / game

BLK

1.2 / game

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

51.8

HESI

55.4

57.2

ORtg

59.7

DRtg

-2.5

NRtg

-3.5

Stable NRtg

84%

Stop%

29%

Floor%

21%

eFG%

PIE

65.9

Team DRtg

+6.2

Def. lift

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

6 GP · event rank #35

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.2

PPG

10.5

RPG

1.2

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.2

P44

Playmaking

1.2

P57

Rebounding

10.5

P93

True shooting

22%

P18

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

24%

12 made / 51 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 10 attempts

Free throws

1 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

20% of attempts from three

●2PA 41●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.2 / game

12–51

FGM–FGA

0–10

3PM–3PA

1–14

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.2 / game

TOV

1.7 / game

0.70×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

10.5 / game

OREB

DREB

10.5

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

4.7 / game

STL+BLK

5.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

24%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.