Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Begad Mostafa Mohamed Eissa Ibrahim

EGY · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

4
film items: 0
scout badges: On file
scout report

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

4 public videos

Available for visual validation

Scouting

Final report on file

Human evaluation is clearly labeled

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Chad U18 · 2026-09-10 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

Clipvs vs Chad U18 · 2026-09-10 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip
Clipvs vs Chad U18 · 2026-09-10 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip
Clipvs vs Chad U18 · 2026-09-10 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-10

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

combo_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option

combo_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Gap help, Finishing, Primary initiation.

Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo Guard

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

· Gap help
· Finishing
· Primary initiation

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a on-ball creator. Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option.

Defensive assignments

primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational gap / nail helper (grade 1; assignment confirmed; workload likely reduces at the target level).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Gap help · Finishing

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

4 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

JUCO

JUCO hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

55.5 performance rating · rank 64 · 6 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 83.9 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

37.3% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

60.0% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #64 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

55.5

Event performance

55th event percentile

55.9

Prospect index

54th event percentile

ORtg

83.9

Points / 100 poss.

71st event percentile

DRtg

85.5

Lower is better

31st event percentile

NRtg

-1.6

Two-way margin

55th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 83.9 · 71st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 85.5 · Stop% 60.0% · Team DRtg 85.6

Sample context

6 games · 138 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

57.9% TS98th event percentile

Creation

2.7 APG88th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

55.5

55th event percentile

Prospect index

55.9

54th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

83.9

71st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

85.5

31st event percentile

Two-way margin

-1.6

55th event percentile

Stop percentage

60.0%

47th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.7 PPG

56th event percentile

Creation

2.7 APG

88th event percentile

Rebounding

3.0 RPG

40th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

52nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

57.9% TS

98th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 83.9 ORtg and 85.5 DRtg, producing a -1.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, creation, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and rebounding.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
57.9% TS
98th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Creation
2.7 APG
88th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Offensive efficiency
83.9 ORtg
71st event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
85.5 DRtg
31st event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
40th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

83.9

71st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.7 PPG

56th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

57.9%

98th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

50.0%

88th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.1%

76th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

45.5%

context

1.8 attempts per game

Free throws

68.4%

75th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

37.3%

62nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.7 APG

88th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

85.5

31st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.0

58th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

60.0%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

52nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

34.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-1.6

55th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-2.7

55th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

55.5

55th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

55.9

54th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.9%

60th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.0 RPG

40th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

137.6

context

22.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#64

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

497.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.7

APG

#64

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#64/138Event board →

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.7

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#40/70Event board →

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

1.5

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #63Adem RafrafiTunisia

//current_rank

#64

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #65Bayero AliyouCameroon

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#62
Jason Ake
Côte d'Ivoire
3.8 PPG 3.7 RPG 5.7 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.7

APG

1.7

SPG

0.0

BPG

46%

3P%

58%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #64

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.7

APG

3.0

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

58%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.7

P56

Playmaking

2.7

P88

Rebounding

3.0

P40

True shooting

58%

P98

Two-way impact

-1.6

P55

Stops

60%

P47

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

38%

8 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

46%

5 made / 11 attempts

Free throws

68%

13 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

52% of attempts from three

●2PA 10●3PA 11

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.7 / game

8–21

FGM–FGA

5–11

3PM–3PA

13–19

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.7 / game

TOV

3.0 / game

0.89×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.0 / game

OREB

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

STL

1.7 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

55.5

HESI

55.9

83.9

ORtg

85.5

DRtg

-1.6

NRtg

-2.7

Stable NRtg

60%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

50%

eFG%

PIE

85.6

Team DRtg

+0.0

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #40

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

1.5

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.0

P30

Playmaking

1.5

P61

Rebounding

1.3

P16

True shooting

36%

P40

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

20%

3 made / 15 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

2 made / 6 attempts

Free throws

100%

4 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

40% of attempts from three

●2PA 9●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.0 / game

3–15

FGM–FGA

2–6

3PM–3PA

4–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.5 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

0.86×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

1.3 / game

OREB

DREB

1.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.8 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

27%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.