ORtg
75.1
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Adem Rafrafi
TUN · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
5.7 APGCreation · 99th event percentile
12.0 PPGScoring load · 89th event percentile
- 54.0
- HESI v2.1
- #63
- of 138
- 77%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #63 of 138 · High confidence
HESI
54.0
Event performance
54th event percentile
PI
55.9
Prospect index
55th event percentile
ORtg
75.1
Points / 100 poss.
50th event percentile
DRtg
77.9
Lower is better
52nd event percentile
NRtg
-2.8
Two-way margin
52nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 75.1 · 50th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 77.9 · Stop% 52.3% · Team DRtg 72.7
Sample context
6 games · 202 minutes · 77% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
5.7 APG99th event percentile
Scoring load
12.0 PPG89th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
54.0
54th event percentile
Prospect index
55.9
55th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
75.1
50th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
77.9
52nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-2.8
52nd event percentile
Stop percentage
52.3%
26th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
12.0 PPG
89th event percentile
Creation
5.7 APG
99th event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
40th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.4% TS
60th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Creator
5.7 APG · 99th event percentile
- P89
Scorer
12.0 PPG · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 54th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 75.1 ORtg and 77.9 DRtg, producing a -2.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Creation
5.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 89th event percentile
Scoring load
12.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 76th event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 26th event percentile
Defensive stops
52.3% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
12.0 PPG
89th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.4%
60th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
35.5%
55th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.3%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context4.7 attempts per game
Free throws
68.4%
75th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
33.9%
48th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.7 APG
99th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
77.9
52nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.3
25th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
52.3%
26th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
40th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
42.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-2.8
52nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-3.4
54th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
54.0
54th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
55.9
55th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.3%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
202.3
context33.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
77.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#63
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
476.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
12.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
5.7
APG
#63
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#17
RANK
131
FIELD
88%
PERCENTILE
17.6
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#63/138Event board →
6
GP
12.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
5.7
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#17/131Event board →
5
GP
17.6
PPG
4.6
RPG
3.2
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#8/34Event board →
4
GP
8.3
PPG
4.0
RPG
3.5
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #62Jason AkeCôte d'Ivoirerank_below · #64Begad Mostafa Mohamed Eissa IbrahimEgypt
//current_rank
#63
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#61
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
17.6
PPG
4.6
RPG
3.2
APG
3.0
SPG
0.6
BPG
24%
3P%
43%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #63
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
5.7
APG
5.2
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.0
P89
Playmaking
5.7
P99
Rebounding
5.7
P76
True shooting
39%
P60
Two-way impact
-2.8
P52
Stops
52%
P26
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
26 made / 83 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
7 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
68%
13 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
●2PA 55●3PA 28
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
72
PTS
12.0 / game
26–83
FGM–FGA
7–28
3PM–3PA
13–19
FTM–FTA
creation
34
AST
5.7 / game
31
TOV
5.2 / game
1.10×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
34
REB
5.7 / game
11
OREB
23
DREB
5.7
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
54.0
HESI
55.9
PI
75.1
ORtg
77.9
DRtg
-2.8
NRtg
-3.4
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
9%
PIE
72.7
Team DRtg
-5.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.3
PPG
4.0
RPG
3.5
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.3
P81
Playmaking
3.5
P87
Rebounding
4.0
P59
True shooting
40%
P60
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
12 made / 38 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
3 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
6 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
8.3 / game
12–38
FGM–FGA
3–15
3PM–3PA
6–8
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
3.5 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
1.08×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
4
OREB
12
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
9
STL
2.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
36%
eFG%
6%
PIE
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
5 GP · event rank #17
//quick_read
The line at a glance
17.6
PPG
4.6
RPG
3.2
APG
4.4
TOV/G
2.0
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
17.6
P99
Playmaking
3.2
P88
Rebounding
4.6
P60
True shooting
43%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
34%
31 made / 92 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
24%
10 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
16 made / 24 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 51●3PA 41
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
88
PTS
17.6 / game
31–92
FGM–FGA
10–41
3PM–3PA
16–24
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
3.2 / game
22
TOV
4.4 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
23
REB
4.6 / game
2
OREB
21
DREB
4.6
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.0 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
14
PF
18
STL+BLK
3.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
39%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.