ORtg
83.2
70th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Seifalla Ahmed
EGY · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
55.7% TSScoring efficiency · 95th event percentile
5.7 RPGRebounding · 76th event percentile
- 54.7
- HESI v2.1
- #61
- of 138
- 61%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
3 public videos
Available for visual validation
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #61 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
54.7
Event performance
55th event percentile
PI
56.5
Prospect index
56th event percentile
ORtg
83.2
Points / 100 poss.
70th event percentile
DRtg
84.3
Lower is better
34th event percentile
NRtg
-1.1
Two-way margin
55th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 83.2 · 70th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 84.3 · Stop% 62.9% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
6 games · 95 minutes · 61% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
55.7% TS95th event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG76th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
54.7
55th event percentile
Prospect index
56.5
56th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
83.2
70th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
84.3
34th event percentile
Two-way margin
-1.1
55th event percentile
Stop percentage
62.9%
58th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.7 PPG
67th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
22nd event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
53rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.7% TS
95th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 83.2 ORtg and 84.3 DRtg, producing a -1.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, rebounding, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 76th event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 70th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
83.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 22nd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 34th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
84.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.7 PPG
67th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
55.7%
95th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
54.3%
97th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
51.4%
95th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context1.2 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
98th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.8%
67th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
22nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
84.3
34th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.3
68th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.9%
58th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
53rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-1.1
55th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-2.8
55th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
54.7
55th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
56.5
56th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.8%
80th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
94.8
context15.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
61.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#61
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured highlight
HighlightStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Highlight
scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
03
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.7
PPG
5.7
RPG
0.3
APG
#61
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#10
RANK
70
FIELD
87%
PERCENTILE
8.3
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#61/138Event board →
6
GP
6.7
PPG
5.7
RPG
0.3
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#126/131Event board →
2
GP
0.0
PPG
0.0
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#10/70Event board →
4
GP
8.3
PPG
5.8
RPG
1.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #60Victor Emeka NwaforNigeriarank_below · #62Jason AkeCôte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#61
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#59
Forward · Tunisia
6.0 PPG 7.7 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.7 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
04
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
8.3
PPG
5.8
RPG
1.0
APG
0.5
SPG
1.8
BPG
—
3P%
59%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #61
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.7
PPG
5.7
RPG
0.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.7
P67
Playmaking
0.3
P22
Rebounding
5.7
P76
True shooting
56%
P95
Two-way impact
-1.1
P55
Stops
63%
P58
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
51%
18 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
40
PTS
6.7 / game
18–35
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.14×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
34
REB
5.7 / game
15
OREB
19
DREB
5.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
10
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
54.7
HESI
56.5
PI
83.2
ORtg
84.3
DRtg
-1.1
NRtg
-2.8
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
6%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
+1.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #10
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.3
PPG
5.8
RPG
1.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.3
P71
Playmaking
1.0
P46
Rebounding
5.8
P72
True shooting
59%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
58%
14 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
8% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
8.3 / game
14–24
FGM–FGA
1–2
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
3
TOV
0.8 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
23
REB
5.8 / game
10
OREB
13
DREB
5.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
7
BLK
1.8 / game
8
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
60%
eFG%
4%
PIE
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
2 GP · event rank #126
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.0
PPG
0.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
—
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.0
P3
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
0.0
P1
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 0 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 0 attempts
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–0
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
0
REB
0.0 / game
0
OREB
0
DREB
0.0
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
1
BLK
0.5 / game
0
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
0%
PIE
05
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.