ORtg
60.1
29th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Issameddine Bibabi
Forward · TUN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
209 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
- 3
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Rwanda U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
- Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-15
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
forward · secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. Best current separators: Offensive rebounding, Finishing, Advantage extension, Post defense.
Now · ForwardProjects · Forward
Translatable strengths
- · Offensive rebounding
- · Finishing
- · Advantage extension
- · Post defense
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Can take on more spacing / shooting option responsibility at the target level. closeout attacker translation still needs another representative viewing. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload can expand).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Fits as a secondary creator who attacks tilted floors and keeps the defense rotating. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Projects as a back-line defender in coverages that keep her near the rim. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A low-spacing environment that removes driving and connective passing windows. Extended space assignments that consistently pull her away from the paint.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
MM D1
Mid-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive57.7 performance rating · rank 59 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 60.1 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive26.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive95.5% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #59 of 138 · Established
HESI
57.7
Event performance
58th event percentile
PI
57.6
Prospect index
58th event percentile
ORtg
60.1
Points / 100 poss.
29th event percentile
DRtg
60.0
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+0.1
Two-way margin
58th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 60.1 · 29th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 60.0 · Stop% 95.5% · Team DRtg 72.7
Sample context
6 games · 137 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks89th event percentile
Rebounding
7.7 RPG89th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
57.7
58th event percentile
Prospect index
57.6
58th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.1
29th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
60.0
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+0.1
58th event percentile
Stop percentage
95.5%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.0 PPG
58th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
7.7 RPG
89th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
89th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.1% TS
39th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P96
Defensive Impact
60.0 DRtg · 95% Stop% · 96th event percentile
- P94
Rim Protection
1.5 BPG · 94th event percentile
- P89
Disruptor
3.3 steals + blocks per game · 89th event percentile
- P89
Activity
7.7 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 89th event percentile
- P89
Rebounder
7.7 RPG · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 58th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 60.1 ORtg and 60.0 DRtg, producing a +0.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Defensive stops
95.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
60.0 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 89th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 29th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 39th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.1% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.0 PPG
58th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.1%
39th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
30.2%
39th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.0%
32nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.7%
context3.7 attempts per game
Free throws
63.6%
70th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
26.6%
24th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
60.0
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+12.7
99th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
95.5%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
89th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
51.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+0.1
58th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-1.6
58th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
57.7
58th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
57.6
58th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.1%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.7 RPG
89th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
136.7
context22.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#59
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
476.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.0
PPG
7.7
RPG
1.0
APG
#59
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#6
RANK
34
FIELD
85%
PERCENTILE
5.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#59/138Event board →
6
GP
6.0
PPG
7.7
RPG
1.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#6/34Event board →
4
GP
5.0
PPG
6.8
RPG
2.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #58Nanemadji Allasra AxauceChadrank_below · #60Victor Emeka NwaforNigeria
//current_rank
#59
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#57
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.0
PPG
6.8
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
SPG
3.0
BPG
—
3P%
40%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #59
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.0
PPG
7.7
RPG
1.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.0
P58
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
7.7
P89
True shooting
34%
P39
Two-way impact
+0.1
P58
Stops
95%
P100
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
12 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
23%
5 made / 22 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
7 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 22
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
6.0 / game
12–48
FGM–FGA
5–22
3PM–3PA
7–11
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
46
REB
7.7 / game
7
OREB
39
DREB
7.7
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.8 / game
9
BLK
1.5 / game
22
PF
20
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
57.7
HESI
57.6
PI
60.1
ORtg
60.0
DRtg
+0.1
NRtg
-1.6
Stable NRtg
95%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
5%
PIE
72.7
Team DRtg
+12.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #6
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
6.8
RPG
2.3
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P54
Playmaking
2.3
P69
Rebounding
6.8
P91
True shooting
40%
P63
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
9 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
25% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
5.0 / game
9–24
FGM–FGA
0–6
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
2.3 / game
17
TOV
4.3 / game
0.53×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
27
REB
6.8 / game
10
OREB
17
DREB
6.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
12
BLK
3.0 / game
8
PF
15
STL+BLK
3.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38%
eFG%
5%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.