ORtg
85.0
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Nanemadji Allasra Axauce
CHA · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
44.5% TSScoring efficiency · 72nd event percentile
4.2 RPGRebounding · 59th event percentile
- 58.4
- HESI v2.1
- #58
- of 138
- 56%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #58 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
58.4
Event performance
58th event percentile
PI
58.2
Prospect index
58th event percentile
ORtg
85.0
Points / 100 poss.
74th event percentile
DRtg
82.9
Lower is better
37th event percentile
NRtg
+2.0
Two-way margin
58th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 85.0 · 74th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 82.9 · Stop% 64.7% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
5 games · 75 minutes · 56% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS72nd event percentile
Rebounding
4.2 RPG59th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
58.4
58th event percentile
Prospect index
58.2
58th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.0
74th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
82.9
37th event percentile
Two-way margin
+2.0
58th event percentile
Stop percentage
64.7%
63rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.6 PPG
45th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
42nd event percentile
Rebounding
4.2 RPG
59th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
31st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS
72nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 58th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 85.0 ORtg and 82.9 DRtg, producing a +2.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive activity and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 74th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 31st event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 37th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
82.9 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.6 PPG
45th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.5%
72nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
47.6%
82nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
84th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
40.0%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
27.3%
13th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
40.9%
76th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
42nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
82.9
37th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.9
74th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.7%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
31st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
19.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+2.0
58th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-1.3
58th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
58.4
58th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
58.2
58th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.7%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.2 RPG
59th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
75.0
context15.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
55.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#58
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
492.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
4.6
PPG
4.2
RPG
0.8
APG
#58
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#58/138Event board →
5
GP
4.6
PPG
4.2
RPG
0.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #57Pape Moussa DialloPG · Senegalrank_below · #59Issameddine BibabiF · Tunisia
//current_rank
#58
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#56
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
4.6
PPG
4.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.0
BPG
40%
3P%
45%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #58
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.6
PPG
4.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.6
P45
Playmaking
0.8
P42
Rebounding
4.2
P59
True shooting
45%
P72
Two-way impact
+2.0
P58
Stops
65%
P63
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
9 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
27%
3 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
24% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
4.6 / game
9–21
FGM–FGA
2–5
3PM–3PA
3–11
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
21
REB
4.2 / game
6
OREB
15
DREB
4.2
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
58.4
HESI
58.2
PI
85.0
ORtg
82.9
DRtg
+2.0
NRtg
-1.3
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+1.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.