ORtg
62.3
34th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Pape Moussa Diallo
Point Guard · SEN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
194 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
2 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
- 2
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Rwanda U18 · 2026-09-20 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Clipvs vs Rwanda U18 · 2026-09-20 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-20
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
combo_guard · lead_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option
combo_guard · lead_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Finishing, Primary initiation, Ball-screen creation.
Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo GuardProjects · Lead Guard
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Finishing
- · Primary initiation
- · Ball-screen creation
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a on-ball creator. Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Finishing · Primary initiation
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D3
NCAA Division III hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive60.6 performance rating · rank 57 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 62.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive31.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive73.7% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #57 of 138 · Established
HESI
60.6
Event performance
61st event percentile
PI
60.0
Prospect index
59th event percentile
ORtg
62.3
Points / 100 poss.
34th event percentile
DRtg
59.8
Lower is better
94th event percentile
NRtg
+2.5
Two-way margin
60th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 62.3 · 34th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.8 · Stop% 73.7% · Team DRtg 60.6
Sample context
6 games · 156 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.5 APG87th event percentile
Scoring load
9.5 PPG80th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
60.6
61st event percentile
Prospect index
60.0
59th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
62.3
34th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.8
94th event percentile
Two-way margin
+2.5
60th event percentile
Stop percentage
73.7%
83rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.5 PPG
80th event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
87th event percentile
Rebounding
4.2 RPG
58th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.8 stocks
80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.2% TS
36th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P88
Defensive Impact
59.8 DRtg · 74% Stop% · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 61st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 62.3 ORtg and 59.8 DRtg, producing a +2.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 94th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 87th event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 83rd event percentile
Defensive stops
73.7% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 34th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
62.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 36th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.5 PPG
80th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.2%
36th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
27.7%
33rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
27.0%
42nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
7.7%
context2.2 attempts per game
Free throws
59.3%
63rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
31.6%
39th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.5 APG
87th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.8
94th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
60.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.7
65th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
73.7%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.8 STL+BLK
80th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
45.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+2.5
60th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+0.3
61st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
60.6
61st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
60.0
59th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.2%
49th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.2 RPG
58th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
155.6
context25.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#57
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
470.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.5
PPG
4.2
RPG
2.5
APG
#57
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#57/138Event board →
6
GP
9.5
PPG
4.2
RPG
2.5
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #56Oolakunle David KayodeNigeriarank_below · #58Nanemadji Allasra AxauceChad
//current_rank
#57
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#55
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.5
PPG
4.2
RPG
2.5
APG
2.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
8%
3P%
33%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #57
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.5
PPG
4.2
RPG
2.5
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.5
P80
Playmaking
2.5
P87
Rebounding
4.2
P58
True shooting
33%
P36
Two-way impact
+2.5
P60
Stops
74%
P83
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
20 made / 74 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
8%
1 made / 13 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
16 made / 27 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
●2PA 61●3PA 13
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
57
PTS
9.5 / game
20–74
FGM–FGA
1–13
3PM–3PA
16–27
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
26
TOV
4.3 / game
0.58×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
25
REB
4.2 / game
5
OREB
20
DREB
4.2
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.5 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
7
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
60.6
HESI
60.0
PI
62.3
ORtg
59.8
DRtg
+2.5
NRtg
+0.3
Stable NRtg
74%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
4%
PIE
60.6
Team DRtg
+0.7
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.