Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Ouwa Camara portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Ouwa Camara

Point Guard · MLI · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

5.0 RPGRebounding · 69th event percentile

1.2 stocksDefensive activity · 50th event percentile

61.3
HESI v2.1
#55
of 138
56%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #55 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

61.3

Event performance

61st event percentile

PI

60.5

Prospect index

61st event percentile

ORtg

74.4

Points / 100 poss.

48th event percentile

DRtg

69.5

Lower is better

74th event percentile

NRtg

+4.9

Two-way margin

63rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 74.4 · 48th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 69.5 · Stop% 53.9% · Team DRtg 62.7

Sample context

5 games · 77 minutes · 56% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

5.0 RPG69th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks50th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

61.3

61st event percentile

Prospect index

60.5

61st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

74.4

48th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

69.5

74th event percentile

Two-way margin

+4.9

63rd event percentile

Stop percentage

53.9%

30th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.6 PPG

20th event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Rebounding

5.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

50th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.7% TS

37th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P93

    Rim Protection

    1.2 BPG · 93rd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 61st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.4 ORtg and 69.5 DRtg, producing a +4.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, defensive stops, and creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    69.5 DRtg

    74th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Rebounding

    5.0 RPG

    69th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    1.6 PPG

    20th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  2. Defensive stops

    53.9% Stop%

    30th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Creation

    0.6 APG

    34th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

74.4

48th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.6 PPG

20th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

33.7%

37th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

36.4%

59th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

36.4%

71st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.6 attempts per game

Free throws

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.1%

56th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

69.5

74th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-6.8

14th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

53.9%

30th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

50th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

17.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+4.9

63rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+0.4

61st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

61.3

61st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

60.5

61st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.3%

49th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

76.7

context

15.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

56.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#55

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

493.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.6

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.6

APG

#55

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#55/138Event board →

5

GP

1.6

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.6

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #54Emmanuel Oshiobugie IdornigieNigeria

//current_rank

#55

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #56Oolakunle David KayodeNigeria
  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Belal Sohaib portrait#53

    Belal Sohaib

    Power Forward · Egypt

    11.5 PPG 6.8 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalRim Protection3.0 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

1.6

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.6

APG

0.0

SPG

1.2

BPG

0%

3P%

34%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #55

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.6

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.6

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

34%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.6

P20

Playmaking

0.6

P34

Rebounding

5.0

P69

True shooting

34%

P37

Two-way impact

+4.9

P63

Stops

54%

P30

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

36%

4 made / 11 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

27% of attempts from three

●2PA 8●3PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

8

PTS

1.6 / game

4–11

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

0–2

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.6 / game

5

TOV

1.0 / game

0.60×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

25

REB

5.0 / game

13

OREB

12

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

0

STL

0.0 / game

6

BLK

1.2 / game

5

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

61.3

HESI

60.5

PI

74.4

ORtg

69.5

DRtg

+4.9

NRtg

+0.4

Stable NRtg

54%

Stop%

36%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

3%

PIE

62.7

Team DRtg

-6.8

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games77 minutes15.3 min/game56% sample weightrank #55 of 138

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.