Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Emmanuel Oshiobugie Idornigie

NGR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

11.4 PPGScoring load · 87th event percentile

6.0 RPGRebounding · 80th event percentile

59.9
HESI v2.1: #54
of 138: 70%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #54 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

59.9

Event performance

60th event percentile

60.6

Prospect index

61st event percentile

ORtg

88.8

Points / 100 poss.

79th event percentile

DRtg

86.8

Lower is better

27th event percentile

NRtg

+2.0

Two-way margin

59th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 88.8 · 79th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 86.8 · Stop% 49.8% · Team DRtg 81.6

Sample context

5 games · 142 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

11.4 PPG87th event percentile

Rebounding

6.0 RPG80th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

59.9

60th event percentile

Prospect index

60.6

61st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

88.8

79th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

86.8

27th event percentile

Two-way margin

+2.0

59th event percentile

Stop percentage

49.8%

17th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

11.4 PPG

87th event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Rebounding

6.0 RPG

80th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.0% TS

66th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P87
Scorer
11.4 PPG · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 60th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 88.8 ORtg and 86.8 DRtg, producing a +2.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, rebounding, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Scoring load
11.4 PPG
87th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
80th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Offensive efficiency
88.8 ORtg
79th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
49.8% Stop%
17th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
86.8 DRtg
27th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
31st event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

88.8

79th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

11.4 PPG

87th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

42.0%

66th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

39.7%

67th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

31.7%

59th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

30.3%

context

6.6 attempts per game

Free throws

63.6%

70th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

37.7%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

86.8

27th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

81.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.2

26th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

49.8%

17th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.6 STL+BLK

31st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+2.0

59th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-0.2

60th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

59.9

60th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

60.6

61st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.4%

66th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.0 RPG

80th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

142.4

context

28.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

70.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#54

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

435.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

11.4

PPG

6.0

RPG

0.6

APG

#54

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#54/138Event board →

11.4

PPG

6.0

RPG

0.6

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3

Regional · 2026

#29/33Event board →

2.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

0.8

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #53Belal SohaibPF · Egypt

//current_rank

#54

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #55Ouwa CamaraPG · Mali

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#52
Moustafa Tamer Moustafa Abdelaziz Aly Shahin
Egypt
4.7 PPG 1.7 RPG 1.7 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

11.4

PPG

6.0

RPG

0.6

APG

0.6

SPG

0.0

BPG

30%

3P%

42%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #54

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.4

PPG

6.0

RPG

0.6

APG

2.0

TOV/G

2.0

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.4

P87

Playmaking

0.6

P34

Rebounding

6.0

P80

True shooting

42%

P66

Two-way impact

+2.0

P59

Stops

50%

P17

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

32%

20 made / 63 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

30%

10 made / 33 attempts

Free throws

64%

7 made / 11 attempts

Shot selection

52% of attempts from three

●2PA 30●3PA 33

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

11.4 / game

20–63

FGM–FGA

10–33

3PM–3PA

7–11

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.6 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

0.30×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

6.0 / game

OREB

DREB

6.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

59.9

HESI

60.6

88.8

ORtg

86.8

DRtg

+2.0

NRtg

-0.2

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

38%

Floor%

40%

eFG%

PIE

81.6

Team DRtg

-5.2

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026

4 GP · event rank #29

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

0.8

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

29%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.0

P23

Playmaking

0.8

P45

Rebounding

2.0

P23

True shooting

29%

P20

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

17%

2 made / 12 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

100%

4 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

17% of attempts from three

●2PA 10●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.0 / game

2–12

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

4–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.8 / game

TOV

1.3 / game

0.60×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

2.0 / game

OREB

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

17%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.