ORtg
99.0
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Moustafa Tamer Moustafa Abdelaziz Aly Shahin
EGY · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
54.9% TSScoring efficiency · 94th event percentile
1.7 APGCreation · 72nd event percentile
- 63.5
- HESI v2.1
- #52
- of 138
- 42%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #52 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
63.5
Event performance
63rd event percentile
PI
62.3
Prospect index
63rd event percentile
ORtg
99.0
Points / 100 poss.
89th event percentile
DRtg
88.9
Lower is better
20th event percentile
NRtg
+10.1
Two-way margin
70th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 99.0 · 89th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.9 · Stop% 52.0% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
3 games · 43 minutes · 42% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
54.9% TS94th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG72nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
63.5
63rd event percentile
Prospect index
62.3
63rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.0
89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.9
20th event percentile
Two-way margin
+10.1
70th event percentile
Stop percentage
52.0%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.7 PPG
46th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
72nd event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
40th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
54.9% TS
94th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 63rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 99.0 ORtg and 88.9 DRtg, producing a +10.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 94th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
54.9% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 89th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 72nd event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 20th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.9 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 23rd event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 24th event percentile
Defensive stops
52.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.7 PPG
46th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
54.9%
94th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
45.5%
87th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context1.3 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
84th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.7%
88th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
72nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.9
20th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.4
35th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
52.0%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
40th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
9.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+10.1
70th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+1.1
63rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
63.5
63rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
62.3
63rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.5%
40th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
42.9
context14.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
41.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#52
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
4.7
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.7
APG
#52
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#52/138Event board →
3
GP
4.7
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.7
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#37/70Event board →
4
GP
6.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #51Ladji Adama KonatéCôte d'Ivoirerank_below · #53Belal SohaibPF · Egypt
//current_rank
#52
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#50
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
4.7
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
25%
3P%
55%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #52
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.7
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.7
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.7
P46
Playmaking
1.7
P72
Rebounding
1.7
P23
True shooting
55%
P94
Two-way impact
+10.1
P70
Stops
52%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
46%
5 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
14
PTS
4.7 / game
5–11
FGM–FGA
1–4
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.7 / game
4
TOV
1.3 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.7 / game
3
OREB
2
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
3
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
63.5
HESI
62.3
PI
99.0
ORtg
88.9
DRtg
+10.1
NRtg
+1.1
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
46%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
2%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
-3.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #37
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.0
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P56
Playmaking
1.0
P46
Rebounding
2.8
P41
True shooting
43%
P57
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
10 made / 28 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
3 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
6.5 / game
10–28
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
3–5
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
6
TOV
1.5 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
7
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
41%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.