ORtg
85.2
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Ladji Adama Konaté
CIV · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
52.1% TSScoring efficiency · 86th event percentile
0.3 stocksDefensive activity · 23rd event percentile
- 62.0
- HESI v2.1
- #51
- of 138
- 21%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #51 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
62.0
Event performance
62nd event percentile
PI
62.3
Prospect index
63rd event percentile
ORtg
85.2
Points / 100 poss.
74th event percentile
DRtg
63.5
Lower is better
86th event percentile
NRtg
+21.7
Two-way margin
84th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 85.2 · 74th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.5 · Stop% 80.6% · Team DRtg 68.8
Sample context
3 games · 16 minutes · 21% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
52.1% TS86th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks23rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
62.0
62nd event percentile
Prospect index
62.3
63rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.2
74th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.5
86th event percentile
Two-way margin
+21.7
84th event percentile
Stop percentage
80.6%
92nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.0 PPG
15th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks
23rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.1% TS
86th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 62nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 85.2 ORtg and 63.5 DRtg, producing a +21.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 92nd event percentile
Defensive stops
80.6% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 86th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 6th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 15th event percentile
Scoring load
1.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 23rd event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.0 PPG
15th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.1%
86th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
93rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
45th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.1%
87th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.5
86th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
68.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.3
89th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
80.6%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.3 STL+BLK
23rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
5.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+21.7
84th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+0.4
62nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
62.0
62nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
62.3
63rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.5%
34th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
16.2
context5.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
21.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#51
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
502.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
1.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
0.0
APG
#51
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#51/138Event board →
3
GP
1.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#53/131Event board →
6
GP
2.7
PPG
6.3
RPG
0.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #50Fedi El AirSG · Tunisiarank_below · #52Moustafa Tamer Moustafa Abdelaziz Aly ShahinEgypt
//current_rank
#51
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#49
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
1.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
52%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #51
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.0
P15
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.7
P23
True shooting
52%
P86
Two-way impact
+21.7
P84
Stops
81%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
3
PTS
1.0 / game
1–2
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.7 / game
1
OREB
4
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
62.0
HESI
62.3
PI
85.2
ORtg
63.5
DRtg
+21.7
NRtg
+0.4
Stable NRtg
81%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
1%
PIE
68.8
Team DRtg
+5.3
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #53
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.7
PPG
6.3
RPG
0.3
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.7
P29
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
6.3
P73
True shooting
36%
P55
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 19●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
2.7 / game
7–19
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–7
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.22×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
38
REB
6.3 / game
13
OREB
25
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
14
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.